Archive for July 4th, 2006

Bryce Zabel’s Superman Smackdown

Tuesday, July 4th, 2006

FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH | Bryce Zabel: Superman Returns (2006) vs Superman: The Movie (1978)

Here’s a great review of Superman Returns in comparison with the original Superman movie (I love Bryce’s new concept in movie reviews).

I agree with him on just about everything, but I think my decision would have come down in a very close call for the 1978 film. Yes, it was less real, but it held more emotion for me.

I could talk about this one for days, probably, but three posts on the same subject in a few hours is bit obsessive, so I’ll leave it go for a while now.

Related posts

Review: Superman Returns :: Spoilers!!

Tuesday, July 4th, 2006

This is a follow-up to my previous, spoiler-free post. I have a few observations about continuity problems in Superman Returns.
Spoilers below! If you want to read it, take your mouse and click & drag from here until the end of the post.

In Superman II, Lois and Clark sleep together. In this movie Lois has a son, Jason, who is presumably five years old and who turns out to be Superman’s son. However, she is with another man, Richard, and apparently both he and Lois believe Jason to be Richard’s. Given that she doesn’t remember her tryst with Clark, that’s believable — except of course for the timing. She’d have had to have gotten over Superman really quickly to not know that Jason wasn’t Richard’s son. And Richard would have to be a moron, too. And if she did know that Jason is not Richard’s, who did she think the father was?

At the end of the movie, Lois seems to accept that Jason is Superman’s son without too much surprise. That’s a big leap considering that for all she knew, she never actually had sex with him. Okay, so maybe when Jason threw the piano across the room, the shock popped the memory block she had. I can believe that — except that it would mean she also knew that Superman and Clark are the same person. There’s nothing contradicting that in the movie, but I have a hard time believing they’re going to allow that memory to surface.

This isn’t really a spoiler, but I wonder if they’re going to address the fact that Superman no longer has any Kryptonian crystals, because they are now floating in space.

This is really a spoiler for the original movie, but it’s repeated in this one: Jor-El says that Clark will age more slowly than humans, however he seems to grow from a youth to an adult in the same timeframe as humans. I’d be able to work with that, though, if Jor-El hadn’t also said that by the time Clark heard the message, Krypton would have been destroyed for “thousands of your years,” implying that the trip from Krypton to Earth and the 13-18 years spent on the Kent farm was over a thousand years long. So it took him thousands of years to reach an apparent 6 or so year old size, and then he shot up into adulthood at a normal rate? That’s tough to swallow.

None of these things really impact my enjoyment of the movie, but they do cause some problems with continuity when you sit down and think about it.

Related posts

Review: Superman Returns

Tuesday, July 4th, 2006

Superman is back.

Lex Luthor is back, too.

It’s really good.

But is it a triumph?

First, a little explanation: This movie is a sequel/restart. Back in the seventies and eighties, Christopher Reeve (who for many is Superman) starred in four Superman movies. The first, his origin and first meeting with Lex Luthor, and the second, his battle with three Kryptonian escaped convicts, were the only two well-received movies in the series. The current movie ignores the existance of the other movies starring Reeve and restarts the series following the events of the second movie.

Something else you really need to know before going in to this movie: In the second movie, Lois Lane discovers that Clark Kent is really Superman, and he relinquishes his powers to be with her (and to be with her). That’s all very nice until the aforementioned convicts show up and there is no one to stop them. So Clark figures out a way to get his powers back and stops them. In the final scenes of that movie, Lois is expressing how hard it is to keep a secret this huge and how it’s eating her up. Clark feels bad that she is in this position and kisses her, and in the process wipes her mind of most of the events from that movie, including Clark’s secret.

According to the new movie, soon after that happens, scientists discover what they think is Krypton. Clark needs to go see for himself whether the planet of his birth actually does still exist - hoping that perhaps he is not the last of his race - and leaves for a 5 year round trip without saying goodbye to Lois or the world.

Superman Returns

Superman Returns begins with Lex Luthor having been recently released from prison and conning an incredibly rich dying woman into leaving her entire estate to him. Meanwhile, in Kansas, Martha Kent’s crops are ripped up by another spaceship crash, signaling the return of her adopted son. The now mega-rich Luthor goes to Superman’s abandoned Fortress of Solitude (having been there in the second movie) and steals the Kryptonian crystals - the advanced Kryptonian technology that will give him all the power he needs to rule the world. This sets the events in motion for another Superman/Luthor clash.

Brandon Routh does an excellent job as Superman and Clark, and were it not for Christopher Reeve’s shadow I don’t think I would have any problems with him at all. In the end, I think he was excellent, but not quite as good as Reeve. I think there were a couple of things contributing to that, but the one that comes to mind right now is his voice. Reeve changed his voice a little for each character: Clark was a little more nasally and nerdy, and Superman was more full and powerful. I don’t remember Routh’s voice changing at all. It’s a subtle thing, but it adds to the separation of the characters.

Kevin Spacey is also excellent as Lex Luthor. The only complaint I have is that I wanted to see more of him in “really mad” mode. The ubiquitous clip from the trailer where he yells at Lois is the best (and almost only) we get there.

Kate Bosworth was okay as Lois Lane. I can’t put my finger on it, but there was something missing from her character. I almost didn’t care about her at all. Maybe it’s that she was a little too jaded.

The effects were great. There were some totally iconic scenes, most of which are seen in the trailers. The Superman-versus-Gatling Gun scene is a great example. Absolutely perfect. Like it was ripped right out of a comic book.

The big Shuttle/plane accident set piece was a minute or two too long, but wow… great stuff visually. I thought the flying through the wing scene was going to be my favorite moment in the movie, but it turned out to be when he flew at top speed through the Daily Planet building to catch the falling globe. Very cool. I also liked how he dealt with all the falling glass without loosing momentum.

There were one or two continuity issues that I’ll deal with in a separate post because they are spoilers.

All in all it was an excellent movie, and a worthy addition to the series and the larger Superman legacy. It even takes the character in a direction I don’t think it has ever been taken before, which is cool. I liked the movie a lot.

But was it everything I wanted it to be? Almost, but not quite. The one thing I missed was the excitement and wonder I felt when I saw the original Superman movies, and more recently, Spiderman 2. That movie left me feeling triumphant and almost breathless. This movie left me feeling with a warmer, “Yeah, that was really good” mood. I loved what they did, but I missed the triumph.

Still a great flick though. Four out of five stars.

Related posts