About me

I'm a geek working as a distance learning specialist for a large corporation.

My Pandora "radio station" profile
This is my favorite way to listen to music now.

My Yahoo "radio station"
(Unfortunately, only works in IE.)

Shopping

Looking to purchase something online? Support Caddickisms by going through one of these links:

Caddickisms Store

Amazon.com

Calendar

July 2006
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Topics

Posts by month

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Review: Superman Returns :: Spoilers!!

This is a follow-up to my previous, spoiler-free post. I have a few observations about continuity problems in Superman Returns.
Spoilers below! If you want to read it, take your mouse and click & drag from here until the end of the post.

In Superman II, Lois and Clark sleep together. In this movie Lois has a son, Jason, who is presumably five years old and who turns out to be Superman’s son. However, she is with another man, Richard, and apparently both he and Lois believe Jason to be Richard’s. Given that she doesn’t remember her tryst with Clark, that’s believable — except of course for the timing. She’d have had to have gotten over Superman really quickly to not know that Jason wasn’t Richard’s son. And Richard would have to be a moron, too. And if she did know that Jason is not Richard’s, who did she think the father was?

At the end of the movie, Lois seems to accept that Jason is Superman’s son without too much surprise. That’s a big leap considering that for all she knew, she never actually had sex with him. Okay, so maybe when Jason threw the piano across the room, the shock popped the memory block she had. I can believe that — except that it would mean she also knew that Superman and Clark are the same person. There’s nothing contradicting that in the movie, but I have a hard time believing they’re going to allow that memory to surface.

This isn’t really a spoiler, but I wonder if they’re going to address the fact that Superman no longer has any Kryptonian crystals, because they are now floating in space.

This is really a spoiler for the original movie, but it’s repeated in this one: Jor-El says that Clark will age more slowly than humans, however he seems to grow from a youth to an adult in the same timeframe as humans. I’d be able to work with that, though, if Jor-El hadn’t also said that by the time Clark heard the message, Krypton would have been destroyed for “thousands of your years,” implying that the trip from Krypton to Earth and the 13-18 years spent on the Kent farm was over a thousand years long. So it took him thousands of years to reach an apparent 6 or so year old size, and then he shot up into adulthood at a normal rate? That’s tough to swallow.

None of these things really impact my enjoyment of the movie, but they do cause some problems with continuity when you sit down and think about it.

0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Related posts:

  1. Review: Superman Returns Superman is back. Lex Luthor is back, too. It’s really...
  2. Spider-Man 3 Teaser Trailer (w/Superman Returns) Apple – Trailers – Spider-Man 3 Oh, man. I can’t...
  3. Review: Justice League (Originally posted Jul 31, 2005 on my older blog) I’ve...
  4. Review: X-Men 3: The Last Stand Hmm…. how do I do this without giving away spoilers?...
  5. Review: Beyond the Sea I learned at least two things from this movie: Bobby...

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge