Archive for July 21st, 2006

Smallville: Green is in this year

Friday, July 21st, 2006

Slice of Scifi - Science Fiction TV & Movie News, Interviews & more » Failed Aquaman Tries On Green Arrow and The CW Network Announces Fall Premiere Schedule

Smallville now has a timeslot! 8pm on Thursdays on the new CW Network, starting on September 28th. Don’t miss it.

And, for what looks like a multi-story arc involving the origin of the Justice League, Green Arrow will be joining the burgeoning Superman.

Some comics fans/purists will have problems with having Clark meet so many budding heros in his younger years (he’s already met at least The Flash, Aquaman, and Cyborg), but my perspective is: “Chill out. It’s a TV show.” The internal consistency of the many Superman comics lines is spotty, to say the least, so what’s one more version? Besides, I think it’s fun.

Related posts

‘Stargate’ sequels (Note: NOT SG-1)

Friday, July 21st, 2006

GateWorld - News: Devlin optimistic about ‘Stargate’ sequels

Dean Devlin, producer of the original 1994 movie Stargate, seems to be moving forward with two sequels to the film, which was apparently meant as the kickoff to a trilogy from the beginning.

Devlin was never a big supporter of what has become a record-breaking TV spinoff of his creation, though he says he is proud of Stargate: SG-1 for its success.

In fact, the article states:

Devlin also believes that his original mythology can coexist with the hit TV series, the events of which picked up one year after the end of the film. “I think the series could still live at the end of the third sequel,” he said. “So we’re going to try to not tread on their stories.”

I’m not sure how he’s going to pull that off, given that SG-1’s story starts 1 year after the movie ends, and the new movies would begin 12 years after the first movie (2 years after the current timeline in the show). But I’m also perfectly happy to see the alternate version of the story as originally intended, and can separate it from the SG-1 show canon. After all, there were one or two leaps that had to be made to get from the movie to the show originally. I’m content to treat them somewhat separately.

The difficulty is going to be when they start releasing SG-1 or Atlantis movies. That’s when the general public is going to get confused, I think.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

Ted Koppel on Iran & US involvement in Middle East

Friday, July 21st, 2006

FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH | Bryce Zabel: Koppel on Iran

I don’t plan to get into politics too much on this blog, but I do agree with Zabel that this is an excellent and important article for people to read and understand.

Related posts

Bryce Zabel: Those who can, teach

Friday, July 21st, 2006

FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH | Bryce Zabel: Produce or Perish! | USC School of Cinema & Television CNTV589

Bryce Zabel is going to be a professor at USC. If his class is anywhere near as informative and entertaining as his blog, I think his students will be well served. He said a few things that disturbed me, though.

Like everybody who’s actually making a living at screenwriting in this town, my first response when asked was to be very leery about teaching a class because we all know that phrase: “Those that can’t do, teach.”

I really, seriously, have a problem with that phrase. It bothers me that he gives it any credence, and much of his post is spent convincing us (and himself) that it’s not a cop-out for him to teach. It’s even more depressing since, as he says, he “comes from a family of teachers” and should know better. If you can’t “do,” you sure as heck shouldn’t be teaching others how to “do.” That just leads to a whole new generation of people who can’t “do.” The whole success of the teaching profession is based on the premise that someone who knows what they’re talking about imparts that knowledge to others. And by that criteria, it would seem Bryce would be a great choice for a teacher. It’s disappointing that he doesn’t seem to see the honor in it.

Teaching is not a second-rate profession. It’s a privilege - and a challenging one, at that.

On the other hand, I come from a family of teachers and it’s in my blood. Besides, I’m secure about my credits, and if people with credits don’t give back, that’s a shame. Also, if you’re going to teach anywhere, doing it at the University of Southern California’s School of Cinema and Television is the place to do it. Famous alumni, famous students, famous supporters — it’s got it all. So, those are my rationalizations, and I’m sticking with them.

It also bothers me that the connection with “the famous” is a motivating factor. Teach there because it’s a high quality school; “fame” as a criteria seems a bit superficial (though it could be argued that the fame comes as a result of the school’s quality, but even if that is the case, the emphasis is in the wrong place).

Bryce, if you’re reading, I give you serious congratulations on your choice to teach this class, and I’ll say I’m jealous of the students who will participate. It sounds like an excellent course. I just hope you understand the privilege you have in shaping these minds and I wish you wouldn’t perpetuate the misconception of teaching so sadly popularized in our nation.

Related posts