About me

I'm a geek working as a distance learning specialist for a large corporation.

My Pandora "radio station" profile
This is my favorite way to listen to music now.

My Yahoo "radio station"
(Unfortunately, only works in IE.)

Shopping

Looking to purchase something online? Support Caddickisms by going through one of these links:

Caddickisms Store

Amazon.com

Calendar

February 2007
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728  

Topics

Posts by month

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Review: V for Vendetta

The Wachowski brothers have a firm grasp of visuals and a healthy respect for graphic novels. They also know how to write a script that challenges the viewer’s perceptions of reality. Put those things together and you’ve got V for Vendetta.

Here are my “tip of the tongue” thoughts on the film:

  • The beginning almost turned me off completely. The alliterative monologue of V’s entrance left me feeling that the writers were showing off and that the movie was going to come off as trite or comical. Luckily, it got better.
  • I thought it was a good choice to never show V’s face, and even to have his past erased. Even he didn’t know who he was beyond an artist in vengence. I wanted to know more about V’s past, but at the same time I know that would have ruined much of the effect of the movie.
  • It’s an interesting statement on the blurry line between terrorism and freedom fighter. In the included documentary, Natalie Portman correctly identified his primary motivation as vengence, though, which is why most people feel some discomfort in cheering for him, despite recognizing the correctness of his political cause.
  • Visually it was just hands-down beautifully shot. So many scenes come to mind as works of art. I don’t usually see a movie and come away thinking, “wow, that would be a great still shot,” but I can think of at least 2 or 3 here without trying. The final knife/gun fight was full of them – notably the shot with the bullets falling out of the revolver in close-up while two henchmen are taken out by knives in the background. That was just an incredibly engaging visual, that owes much to its graphic novel base material (as does the entirety of that fight, for that matter). Evey’s time in the prison had some memorable shots as well. Brilliant stuff.
  • Setting the film in a future dystopia always intrigues me, but at the same time usually comes off as a bit heavy-handed, and this was no exception.

If you like your action movies to be (or at least aspire to be) high-brow, this is the film for you. If you appreciate visually exciting films (as in, excellent composition and cinematography), see this one. If you’re looking for a straight-forward adrenaline rush action flick…. while it has its moments, maybe this isn’t what you’re after.

Overall, I’d give it three and a half stars.

[tags]V for Vendetta, Natalie Portman, Hugo Weaving, Wachowski brothers, The Matrix, cinematography, scene composition[/tags]

0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Related posts:

  1. Review: King Kong There were good and bad points to this [tag]movie[/tag]. First...
  2. Review: Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man’s Chest I’m a little hesitant to review this one, because it...
  3. Review: Superman Returns :: Spoilers!! This is a follow-up to my previous, spoiler-free post. I...
  4. Review: X-Men 3: The Last Stand Hmm…. how do I do this without giving away spoilers?...
  5. Review: Hellboy I wasn’t feeling well today, and there wasn’t much on...

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge