About me

I'm a geek working as a distance learning specialist for a large corporation.

My Pandora "radio station" profile
This is my favorite way to listen to music now.

My Yahoo "radio station"
(Unfortunately, only works in IE.)

Shopping

Looking to purchase something online? Support Caddickisms by going through one of these links:

Caddickisms Store

Amazon.com

Calendar

May 2007
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Topics

Posts by month

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Review: Down with Love

Quick, think of all those movies from the ’60s. The fun ones. The ones with energy that just kept going. Fast dialogue. Bold colors. Doris Day. Frankie and Annette. Tony Randall. Outdoor locations filmed indoors (and you could easily tell). Now think of the television shows of that time. Ed Sullivan and variety shows. “What’s my secret”-type game shows.

Now smoosh them all together in one movie that, on the surface, talks about feminism, gender equality, one-upmanship, and love. Throw in a couple musical numbers. That’s the formula for Down with Love.

The best thing about this movie was the look. They nailed the “hyper-reality” of the ’60s as seen through a Hollywood lens. The split screens for phone conversations, the hats and hair, the overly large rooms, the fake outdoors, the variety show music, the overacting. Everything was perfect. They even had Tony Randall himself.

Aside from some brilliantly written lines, however, the script didn’t do much for me. They concentrated so much on catching the authentic ’60s feel that when they tried to fit in some 21st century it seemed out of place. The split screen with the exercising was a great idea for a visual as a way to make fun of both the topic of conversation and the filming/editing methods, but comes off way too vulgar for the movie. I’d like to say it took me out of the story, but I was never really in the story to begin with. I really just spent most of the movie enjoying the nostalgia it created.

If you were a big fan of the ’60s comedies, you’d probably get a kick out of this movie. If you’re looking for something to fill 90 minutes, you could do worse. If you’re looking for a movie that’ll give you a couple chuckles, go for it. If you’re looking for a good movie… look elsewhere.

Best line, though, was delivered (in a whiny voice) by David Hyde Pierce:

Where’s my Geisha? I need my shoes.

Three stars.

[tags]sixties, David Hyde Pierce, Ewan McGregor, Renee Zellweger[/tags]

0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Related posts:

  1. Review: Ray The movie lived up to the hype. And that’s saying...
  2. Review: Ray (another perspective) My wife’s opinion differed a bit from mine (as usual…...
  3. Review: Beyond the Sea I learned at least two things from this movie: Bobby...
  4. Review: Walk the Line I knew a few phrases from maybe 3 or 4...
  5. Follow-up review: The Prince of Egypt trailer On further reflection there is one more thing I want...

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge