About me

I'm a geek working as a distance learning specialist for a large corporation.

My Pandora "radio station" profile
This is my favorite way to listen to music now.

My Yahoo "radio station"
(Unfortunately, only works in IE.)

Shopping

Looking to purchase something online? Support Caddickisms by going through one of these links:

Caddickisms Store

Amazon.com

Calendar

May 2007
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Topics

Posts by month

Around the site

Ever want to know the difference between a switch vs. a patch panel vs. a hub vs. a gateway/router? HiveMinds :: View topic - New Network Hiveminds is a great web/tech boardSwitch/hub/router/patch panel -- terms defined

This post is all about me feeling better about myself and bragging a little. If you can't handle that, well, sorry. I promise the next post will get back toStatistics and Ego Stroking

Another year has gone by, and more fathering lessons have been learned. Hopefully my kids have learned a bit, too. For my part, I've learned - perhaps more than in otherHappy Fathers Day

Every once in a while people post interesting stuff on Facebook, instead of just the inane time-sucking games and narcissism that usually goes on there. Speaking of narcissism, here's a pictureFound on Facebook - episode 2

Out of the ashes of our future destruction, a new hero has been born. Gabriel Bright. Beacon of hope. Defender of justice. Burdened, as are we all, with the knowledgeThe Birth of Gabriel Bright - DC Universe

F-Shaped Pattern For Reading Web Content (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox) This is the same eye tracking idea I talked about in a previous post. The focus this time, though, is reading patterns. ScanEye-movement tracking & Web Content

Is it the "training industry" or the "learning industry"? (Yeah, I know there are plenty of alternates to make this even more confusing, but let's stick to these two forTraining vs. Learning

Apple - Trailers - Spider-Man 3 Oh, man. I can't wait for this. I'm impressed by how many effects shots they already have done, and it's still a year before itSpider-Man 3 Teaser Trailer (w/Superman Returns)

I absolutely LOVE this story. On Monday night, a fan at a Phillies game ran onto the field during the game. Not an unheard of event. This is the first timePhiladelphia: City of Brotherly Tasering

Dr. Horrible's Sing-along blog I made a quick mention of this once before after seeing the trailer. I just saw the first act (which was so popular it brought down theDr Horrible's Sing-along blog

I'm pretty sure my wife will have no problem confirming this: I'm addicted to The Sing-Off.  Last year's show blew my mind with the talent involved. This year matches thatThe Sing-Off: recap and predictions

Lee posted his "Nerd badge" score recently. He failed to get it, and rightly so. Not because of any lack of nerd-dom on his part, but because of the idiocyThe Nerd Badge is invalidly valid, therefore I get one

Diabetes breakthrough Before you get too excited, let me say this: from my read of the article, it's a long time before humans could benefit, and even when they can, you'llA cure for Type I diabetes?

J. Michael Straczynksi, the creator of the 5-year TV series Babylon 5 in the 90's, has been doing little side stories from the B5 universe on and off since theBabylon 5 - the final word (mostly)

This is one of a series of articles I wrote for The Coalition of Awesomeness blog some time ago. The blog has since gone to an unfortunate (but very awesome)Who do you serve, and who do you trust?

Review: Proof

For a story about a groundbreaking mathematical proof, Proof had virtually zero math in it.

If you ask me, that’s a good thing.

Let me put my review in the form of a mathematical equation, though. (Because I can. Yes, I know it’s a cheap thrill and there’s no real point to it, but it makes me happy, and that’s what’s important. Go ahead; sit there and mock, you cowards who won’t even comment.)

([tag]Gwyneth Paltrow[/tag]) + ([tag]Anthony Hopkins[/tag]) + (Award Winning Stage Play script) – ([tag]Jake Gyllenhaal[/tag]) = (a very good movie)

Okay, that was a cheap shot at Jake. I actually think he did a really good job in the movie despite, as my wife pointed out, not looking enough like a geek to be a mathematician.

The mood of the film was very important in selling it to me. The director did an excellent job, through pacing, different camera shots, and of course the actors, of creating a situation where you weren’t really sure whether Catherine was loosing her mind. You could go either way… it could just be the pressure of her father’s death after giving up her life to care for him, plus the arrival of her well-meaning, but overbearing sister that’s making her act a little flat, or she really could be succumbing to schizophrenia. She wonders if she’s going over the edge from the very beginning of the movie, and you take the journey with her. To me, that was the real focus of the movie: is she going nuts? Can Hal stabalize her?

While I liked it quite a bit, though, it didn’t make me sit back and go “wow” at the end. It was a good film, engrossing, but didn’t leave me either excited or pondering life. I wouldn’t have minded seeing a little more of a triumph at the end, but that would have been the “Hollywood ending”, and I’m glad they didn’t do that, since it kept it more real. The question that remained open about her future was more satisfying, if not as exciting.

This is a hard one for me to rate, honestly. I really liked it, but it didn’t touch me as deeply as I’d hoped. Maybe it will for you.

For now…. three and half stars.

[tags]mathematics, stage to screen[/tags]

Tags: ,

6 comments to Review: Proof

  • Beckela

    Yes, that WAS a cheap shot at Jake. True, he does not look like the stereotypical geek, but there are many geeks out there who don’t fit that mold. I know a few myself. Do you honestly think there would have been that intense attraction between Catherine and Hal if Hal looked like, say, Robert Carradine? I think not. Gwyneth is no slouch herself, by the way! Jake may be gorgeous, but he wouldn’t be a quarter as interesting if he weren’t such a good actor.

    Reply to this comment

  • Hi Beckela,

    Yeah, what can I say? I took the pot shot ’cause I could.

    To be a little more descriptive about the “not looking geeky” criticism, though, you bring up a good point. Gwyneth is no slouch, as you put it, but in the movie she really did look paler than normal, bookish, and a bit lost to the outside world. Her stance was a little more slouched, for example. Granted, not all that was due to her “geek” status, but even beyond the physical, she gave the impression, at a minimum, that her character really understood the nuances of the mathematics, whereas Hal was played more like he had an large interest in the topic, but not much understanding. Certainly not enough to be a professional mathematician. Jake chose to play up the romantic lead angle of the character more than the other aspects of the character. While that’s certainly a valid angle, given the story, I think it was too unbalanced in that direction. YMMV.

    Reply to this comment

  • Beckela

    Good points, Jeff. But, Hal says himself that he will never do anything “great” in mathematics — he comes across to me as a born teacher, which is exactly what he is doing. Without folks like Hal, we’d never have folks like Robert or Catherine. And Hal knows himself, and his limitations, quite well, e.g., that he needs help figuring out the proof. Catherine, on the other hand, has apparently inherited much of her father’s genius — a rarity indeed — which certainly makes her more of a geek. Her father’s illness; her caring for him for so many years, putting her own life on hold; and her own depression (been there, done that) contribute much to her paleness and geekiness as well, IMO.

    I love films/actors/stories that inspire these kinds of discussions. Don’t you?

    Reply to this comment

  • Jeff's wife

    Don’t get me wrong … I thought Jake, as Hal, was easy on the eyes, and I’m sure there are plenty of good looking “geeks” out there. However, my observation was really that he was in very good shape physically. So much so that it seemed likely that it required more effort and intention than his character seemed to exhibit during the course of the story.

    I don’t know if that makes any sense, or any difference! But I just didn’t want to be misrepresented.

    Reply to this comment

  • I love films/actors/stories that inspire these kinds of discussions. Don’t you?

    Absolutely. :)

    I don’t disagree with anything you said, but as I said, I think the balance is just a little off.

    (And congratulations! You got my wife to actually post something! You don’t know how hard that is to do!)

    Reply to this comment

  • Beckela

    Jeff’s Wife:

    Ah, yes. I understand. I long ago stopped noticing actors’ much-muscled bodies that seem inappropriate for the character they are playing. It happens all the time and can be annoying. I wonder if perhaps Jake was preparing for Jarhead while shooting Proof. That body was VERY appropriate for Swofford! I read somewhere that David Fincher asked Jake to lose some of the muscle for Zodiac — quite wise, IMO.

    Jeff:

    I can see what you mean about “balance.” I think I may just see that difference simply as “contrast.”

    Glad I could be of service with your wife! LOL

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge