About me

I'm a geek working as a distance learning specialist for a large corporation.

My Pandora "radio station" profile
This is my favorite way to listen to music now.

My Yahoo "radio station"
(Unfortunately, only works in IE.)

Shopping

Looking to purchase something online? Support Caddickisms by going through one of these links:

Caddickisms Store

Amazon.com

Calendar

February 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Topics

Posts by month

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Quick thoughts on Watchmen: unfilmable?

Is Watchmen unfilmable?

Is Watchmen unfilmable?

I’ve seen the trailers. I’ve seen a bunch of clips. It looks good. The visuals are great. Hard to say much else about it, though, so far.

I’m also reading the book for the first time. At the moment I’m over 3/4 through it, so I don’t know the whole story, but I’ve seen a lot of it. I like the book (probably not a surprise).

Here’s the thing, though. Everyone has told me that this is supposed to be unfilmable. I’m not sure why. Yeah, there are parts that would be challenging to film, but nothing, to this point in the book at least, seems insurmountable. The hardest things I’ve seen would be the concept of Dr. Manhattan’s perception of time and the juxtaposition of the pirate story (Tales of the Black Freighter) with the street corner characters. They certainly would involve some creativity to get on film, but I can at least conceive of how it might be done, and I’m not a filmmaker.

For what it’s worth, though, unless it becomes way more important in the last bit of the book (and it might) it sounds like the decision to remove the pirate story from the film is the right one. It’s not that it’s extraneous in the least in the book—it certainly adds to the book—but it’s also not central. I’m a little sadder to hear the street corner characters are all but missing, but I can live with that, too.

Of course, I may feel completely differently about that once I finish the story.

The frequency of flashbacks could be a problem for a mainstream audience, I suppose. I’ve seen a lot of movies that use flashbacks well, though, so I really don’t think it’s inconceivable that they could be done well here.

I’m a little annoyed that I can’t experience this film both with and without knowing the story ahead of time. I’d like to avoid the book ruining the movie for me, and vice-versa. It sounds like the movie will have a bit of a different ending than the book (or at least a different motivation for the villain), so at least there will be something original to judge on its own merits. Given that I can’t have it both ways, however, I think I’m making the right choice in reading the book first.

It’ll be interesting to me to get my wife’s take on the film. She has not, and will not have, read the book before we see the film. Whether the story is one she’ll get into is questionable. It seems like one that could go either way with her. It depends on which elements they emphasize. I’m looking forward to see what she thinks.

Now I gotta go read more of the book so you guys who comment don’t spoil the end for me… at this point I’m thinking Veidt is the bad guy, but I’m not positive yet. It does seem likely though, since he’s the only one they’ve built up as smart enough to pull something this big off. At the moment the motive seems to be money, but that could be a red herring. It would be kind of boring if it was.

Off to the book!

0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Related posts:

  1. Quick Notes on Entertainment News I’ve fallen really behind on posting lately. Given the upcoming...
  2. Movie news roundup – Sci-Fi and comics lovers, rejoice! Lots of news and some rumors hitting the net lately…...
  3. Iron Man – Movie Trailer Apple – Trailers – Iron Man – Trailer – Large...
  4. Initial thoughts – Premiere week pt 1 I’ll be jotting down my initial thoughts of the shows...
  5. Initial thoughts – Premiere week pt 2 Got caught up on some stuff tonight: Chuck: Entertaining. Pretty...

4 comments to Quick thoughts on Watchmen: unfilmable?

  • Jon

    No comment on the identity of the antagonist. But don’t worry, the motive isn’t anything so boring as money.

    Reply to this comment

    Jeff says:

    As soon as I posted this I went off and finished the book. For the sake of the spoiler-avoidant I’ll refrain from confirming or denying my guess. The motive was certainly not boring, though. What worries me is that I think the motive changes in the movie. I hope it’s as good, though I can’t imagine how.

    As to the rest of what I said about the “filmability” of the thing, I think it still applies.

    Reply to this comment

  • Rob

    I’ve read the TPB of Watchmen a few times, and although I wouldn’t consider it unfilmable, I would find it interesting to see how they can realistically compress all of this material into the span of a 2 hour film.

    Robs latest blog post..December Sun #2 – Page 3A

    Reply to this comment

    Jeff says:

    Well, first of all, the first “final” cut of the film (the one that’ll be on the DVD) was over 3 hours, if I remember correctly. The actual final cut comes it at well over 2 hours, so there’s that.

    But if you take out the Black Freighter and surrounding material you’re well on your way to compressing it. A few more cuts here and there and you’ve got it. You lose a bit of the spice, but not the core.

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge