(Grab your pacemaker, it looks like I’m making two posts in two days! Will the madness ever end?)
A few things came to my attention today that I just couldn’t wait to pass on.
First of all, as you undoubtedly know, Watchmen opened today. No surprise there. But did you know these stats?
- 90% of all Fandango’s weekend ticket sales has been for Watchmen.
- IMAX’s website crashed four times this week due to the increased traffic of people looking for information on Watchmen IMAX showings.
- The movie breaks the record for the most “playdates” for an R-rated film, according to Hollywood Reporter.
- 1600 locations had midnight showings last night. Compare that to 656 midnight showings for that other Zack Snyder film, 300.
Apparently there is some demand for this movie. 
While I’m on the topic of Watchmen, I saw a review of the film in the NY Times today. The reviewer didn’t seem to find the film relevant. As I thought about it, he probably has a point. It is set in 1985, during the Cold War, and it does help to get into that mindset when reading the graphic novel. I’d imagine the film to be the same way. So keep that in mind as you make your way to the multi-plex.
Oh, and I thought of something as I was looking at some of the commercials for the film today. I’m a little worried that they might strip a bit of the realism away from the physicality of the superheroes in the film. In the book, they were mostly just regular people who got this notion into their heads to put on a costume and fight crime. No super-strength, no amazing feats of acrobatics, just people trying to help. For example, in the book, there’s a scene where Nite Owl II and Silk Spectre save some people from a building fire. They land on the roof, run down the stairs, and lead the people back to their ship. In the clip I saw, Silk Spectre leaps from the hovering “Owl Ship” crashes through the roof, and lands cleanly in the top floor hallway. More visually stunning, definitely, but people can’t do that, really. That’s one of the things that set the book apart—its treatment of the heroes (except for Dr. Manhattan) as people who didn’t necessarily have a special physical skill, just a need to help as best they could. Nite Owl II even seemed a bit flabby in some panels, which would be appropriate for someone who was not keeping in shape during his “retirement.”
So while that exaggeration probably won’t keep me from enjoying the film, it is a bit disappointing that they’re apparently ignoring one of the central (IMO) conceits that made the graphic novel unique.
Star Trek has released its third trailer! Take a look at the goodness:
(YouTube is okay and all, but you really ought to see it at the Official Site, or even better, in HD from Apple’s site.)
This one delves a little more into the character and drama than the others (backed up by some dramatic music), and I got a better sense of the early part of the story. And it has, apparently, a planet being swallowed by a black hole weapon. That was just cool. Very nice.
You also get a better sense that the actors are not just doing impersonations of the characters previous interpretations—they’re bringing themselves to the roles. As much as that may grate on some fans, I think that’s a good thing. These actors need to inhabit these characters themselves, not channel some other actors. That never goes well.
Also, I think the battle scenes in this are going to completely blow away any Federation battles we’ve seen to date. I hope I’m right.
Finally, I mentioned in a previous post that the Family Guy crew is going to do a sequel to their “Blue Harvest” send-up of Star Wars IV: A New Hope, focusing on The Empire Strikes Back. The title will be “Something Something Something Dark Side,” which I think is kind of lame, but a little better than “Blue Harvest” (I never really understood that title… can someone explain?). It will debut in the fall.
It’s also been announced, though it’s not too surprising, that they’re already working on a third installment to spoof Return of the Jedi.
Related posts:
- Quick thoughts on Watchmen: unfilmable? Is Watchmen unfilmable? I’ve seen the trailers. I’ve seen a...
- Star Wars: Clone Wars videos (and an Obi-Wan debate settled) I just recently found out that two of my brothers-in-law...
- Star Wars: Clone Wars Theatrical Trailer Star Wars: Video Catch the trailer for the August 15th...
- Star Trek (2009) full trailer released Kirk and Spock over the Enterprise First off, if you...
- Star Wars in 3-D: Not happening soon Star Wars: Community | starwars.com at Comic-Con 2006 At the...
Loading ...
OK my next post will be about Watchmen so avoid my site until you see the film (like you requested).
Star Trek trailer looks amazing.
Lees latest blog post..At least it isn’t the mark 2 armour for a change
Reply to this comment
Jeff says:
March 7th, 2009 at 12:16 am
Heh… thanks for the warning.
Reply to this comment
You know, as a life-long fan of the Trek films, I’m really not sure what to think of this new incarnation yet. I’m not going to judge it yet, but it seems like a lot of action and flash… a big departure from older Kirk and crew quoting Shakespeare while blowing up Khan. But know knows.
As I understand it, ‘Blue Harvest’, btw, was the secret working title of ‘Return of the Jedi’ when it was being filmed, so Lucas and crew could avoid media hype.
Robs latest blog post..December Sun #2 – Page 4B
Reply to this comment
Jeff says:
March 10th, 2009 at 8:08 am
Yeah, I think that Shakespeare is probably going to be sacrificed, at least in large part, in this version. I hope not, but I’d actually be surprised to see it there. Perhaps it’s a habit the characters pick up as they age?
AH! That actually makes sense about Blue Harvest. Thanks for that.
Reply to this comment
I think my approach to this movie is going to be forget everything I know about Star Trek and just sit back and enjoy. The visuals look stunning. The latest previews show a bit of character starting to show through and not just all flash. If I had to nag about anything, it would be that I’d much prefer the characters to be more of a blank slate. So much of the character that Kirk becomes was through experience through some of those first episodes (putting trust in others, etc.). For him to all the sudden have these character traits that you saw him develop in TOS might be a bit disconcerting. But, I’m just going to pretend all that never happened and enjoy. I suspect I’ll be seeing this one a few times and its been awhile since been that excited for a movie. Can’t even think of what last one was.
Reply to this comment
Jeff says:
March 10th, 2009 at 3:45 pm
That’s interesting, Jay. I never really noticed that Kirk grew that much during those early episodes. Maybe I should go back and re-watch them.
The last time I was this excited for a movie was… hmm… maybe Spider-Man 3 or Revenge of the Sith. Actually I was probably more excited about those, but I’m getting there for this one.
Reply to this comment
After christmas, decided to go back and rewatch all of them in preparation for the movie. Of course, now I hear they might all be out on blu-ray when the movie comes out, which means I’ll need to watch them all *again*! If you watch some of the early ones, a lot of them seem like they are set up to add a character trait to him each week. Sometimes just little things like in enemy within where you see his concern/compassion for crew or his faith in fellow crewmates like bailey in cobomite maneuver. One of them, he had this moment with Uhura where gained a little respect for her. Just little things, but it all builds up by the end of the first season and really get a better sense of him. OK, revenge of the Sith I was there at midnite, so going to be hard to top that, but seeing these trailers, I’m getting to point where I might do that.
Reply to this comment