About me

I'm a geek working as a distance learning specialist for a large corporation.

My Pandora "radio station" profile
This is my favorite way to listen to music now.

My Yahoo "radio station"
(Unfortunately, only works in IE.)

Shopping

Looking to purchase something online? Support Caddickisms by going through one of these links:

Caddickisms Store

Amazon.com

Calendar

July 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Topics

Posts by month

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I haven’t read the books. In general I’ve tried to avoid reviews and other spoilers for the film (though I did get spoiled for the ultra-major event, annoyingly). I’ve heard a lot of people say this was the best Potter film yet. They lauded the admirable job condensing the plot from the book into a 2.5 hour film. They loved the more mature (but not too mature) dealing with love.

This was also the first of the series I’ve seen in the theater. I started watching Harry Potter last year and blew through all of the movies over about 5 months. For the most part I liked the way the films worked together. Little hiccups here and there, but overall I felt the films improved in complexity and talent as they went. The battle and surrounding drama at the end of Order of the Phoenix was both a good payoff and a teaser for what I assume is to come.

So when I went into this film, I was pretty much expecting to be blown away by major plot developments, deadly battles, and “Dark Secrets Revealed” as promised by the movie’s tagline.

Eh.

This was the first movie in the series that I felt did not do a good enough job condensing the plot – and remember, I’ve never read the book. I got a small sense that there was more to be had in previous movies, but this one just screamed “INCOMPLETE!” to me. Don’t get me wrong… the screenwriter apparently had a monumental task in front of him to condense this one, and I’m sure he did the best he, or possibly anyone, could. In the end, though, it just didn’t feel right. I didn’t care who the Half-Blood Prince was, even when it was revealed at the end – that mystery just wasn’t developed enough. It certainly didn’t warrant being the title of the film. In general, scenes seemed kind of stitched together. Something was off with the flow. I also thought the pacing was off, with too much energy spent on love-sick teens at the expense of moving the plot along.

Many love-focused scenes were pretty good, for the most part, and would have worked perfectly as punctuation in a better movie, but there was just WAY too much time spent on that topic—especially with Ron and his little hang-ups. Yeah, I laughed where I supposed to, but for the most part it was at the ridiculous over-acting from a certain character or two. On the other hand, there were some really nice, well-done moments in those scenes. They should have followed that pattern for the others. For me there was enough emphasis that Harry Potter and the Love-Sick School would also have been a workable title for this film.

As far as “Dark Secrets Revealed” — okay, which secrets would that be? Yeah, there was one big “secret” revealed about the Half-Blood Prince, but it’s obvious that we’re being fed a lie there in relation to motives and things will turn around in the next and final movies. There was also a secret revealed by Slughorn on which the plot supposedly turned, and it was a big one, I suppose,  but it seemed to me like Dumbledore had already figured it out anyway and was trying to do something about it. Perhaps the number of instances was the shocker for him. (Though I still can’t figure out why Slughorn was reluctant to share it. How did it affect him at all?)

Which leads me to the scene in the cave. The end here, I think, was supposed to invoke a sense of wonder at Dumbledore’s power, but I suspect it was far better realized in the book than on screen. His display at the end of Order of the Phoenix did more for me, and I was hoping for more here. It’s not that it was bad, it just didn’t match the build-up.

In the end, I think that was the problem with the movie overall. There really is some great stuff there, but it just doesn’t come together and step up to match the build-up.

One final thought: this movie works extremely well in one regard—as a lead-in to the finale. While it’s not as well-realized on its own, it does have a few major plot movers put in place and sets up the final quest (which, honestly, seems like a big enough task that it should take another 5 movies).

3 out of 5 stars.

0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Related posts:

  1. Review: The Prince of Egypt It’s hard to do better than the Bible for your...
  2. Follow-up review: The Prince of Egypt trailer On further reflection there is one more thing I want...
  3. Review: Hellboy I wasn’t feeling well today, and there wasn’t much on...
  4. Review: King Kong There were good and bad points to this [tag]movie[/tag]. First...
  5. Review: Deja Vu Hey, guess what… this review will be completely devoid of...

4 comments to Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

  • Jon

    None of the HP films can hold a candle to the books. I’ve stopped expecting or even hoping that they will. You really should check out the books sometime.

    BTW, in the book, it seemed to me that Slughorn was reluctant to reveal his connection to Voldemort partially out of a sense of shame (arguably, but for Slughorn, Voldemort would never have become as…persistent…as he is) and partially out of fear that Voldemort would regard him as a traitor for sharing that information, and seek revenge.

    Reply to this comment

    Jeff says:

    Well, it’s not surprising that the books are better. That’s usually the case. My approach on these is that I’m going to watch the movies first and catch up on the books later. I want to be able to watch the films without comparing them to the books. Everybody else has already read the books, so I get to have a different perspective on the films.

    That’s interesting about Slughorn. I don’t think those reasons were brought out clearly enough in the film, though I can see how they’re there in subtext… except for the persistence thing – there’s obviously a big hole there if that’s something covered in the book.

    Reply to this comment

  • Thanks for the adult review Jeff.

    My daughter and 13 of her friends went to the opening and were allgushing and forgiving of any not so good things.

    Though, I will, as I have with the last 5 HPs, wait for the DVD and buy it.

    We have the books and who knows ? I might read them one day.
    .-= WiddleShamrock´s last blog ..Apologies Feeder Readers =-.

    Reply to this comment

    Jeff says:

    You’re welcome.

    I can totally see a group of girls loving the film, even though it casts teen girls in a rather generic and not too flattering light, IMO (principle cast excepted). All that over the top pining and gushing…

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge