About me

I'm a geek working as a distance learning specialist for a large corporation.

My Pandora "radio station" profile
This is my favorite way to listen to music now.

My Yahoo "radio station"
(Unfortunately, only works in IE.)

Shopping

Looking to purchase something online? Support Caddickisms by going through one of these links:

Caddickisms Store

Amazon.com

Calendar

March 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Apr »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Topics

Posts by month

Around the site

Oh, great... another cause to spend our research money on. Duke Nukem Disease: Come Get Some! - Tuesday TubeWatch

The coolest thing about The Illusionist is that every trick he does is something that can be performed practically. The movie does use a little CGI because of production constraintsReview: The Illusionist

The Second Chance DVD Steve Taylor is no stranger to controversy. His music in the '80s was unabashedly pointed at issues of hypocrisy and general laziness within Christian communities and itsReview: The Second Chance

It's been quite a while since I found some worthy Babylon 5 geeking. Check this out. An impressive job. He fits a huge number of major points from the show intoFive years in two minutes, 27 seconds

This is one of a series of articles I wrote for The Coalition of Awesomeness blog some time ago. The blog has since gone to an unfortunate (but very awesome)Who do you serve, and who do you trust?

A while back my daughter got a look at a minute or so of a Godzilla movie. Here is her description of the film (with some interjections from her sister): SorryTuesday TubeWatch: Godzilla... You gotta see that movie!

The time is shortly upon us. The wait is nearly over. Let the glorious holiday IMAX season BEGIN!!! Wait... let me get my oxygen... Okay. I feel better now. Got a little giddy thereHoliday trailers - Tron: Legacy, Narnia 3, and HP:TDH

Hmm.... how do I do this without giving away spoilers? This was simultaneously the coolest and weakest of the three X-men movies. It earns coolest because it had some excellent battleReview: X-Men 3: The Last Stand

[caption id="attachment_1017" align="alignright" width="466" caption="Gwen and Rhys Cooper saving children from the military"][/caption] Russell T. Davies has a knack with stories. He's very good at writing stories that - despite plotTorchwood: Children of Earth - Review

In my last post, I mentioned a definition of e-Learning I wrote a few years ago. For the record, this is what I said: How do you define e-learning? What areDefining e-Learning

Set in the 12th century Crusades and the defense of Jerusalem, this movie should have been one I loved. The crew took pains to ensure an accurate portrayal of theReview: Kingdom of Heaven

Alright, I'm confused. How could my theme CSS have been reverted back to default? Does that mean someone hacked my site? If so, I guess I'm fortunate that only myTheme of the day... confusion

GateWorld - Cooper: SG-1 will go on On the heels of the long-running series' landmark 200th episode, the Sci-Fi Channel has chosen not to renew Stargate SG-1 for an 11th season.Stargate SG-1: Over and Out?

Pixar has an amazing track record with its movies. The quality of animation is superb and their attention to story is a cut (or two) above most studios. Their worstReview: Brave

I've been quiet on here for a couple weeks due to some time pressures. Lots to do during the lead-up to Christmas, as I'm sure you can all understand. IWhat I've been thinking

Fact checking the easy stuff

So our water company had a break in at one of their tanks recently and while they’re checking to make sure the water hasn’t been contaminated, they’ve issued a “Do Not Consume” warning. The meat of the official warning, as found on the water company web site, is this:

DO NOT DRINK THE WATER UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. Customers are asked to not use the water for drinking, cooking, food preparation, oral hygiene or providing to pets until further notice. Throw away ice cubes if made with tap water after 3:30pm on March 13. The water can be used for sanitary purposes such as bathing and washing. If you have specific health concerns, you may wish to consult your doctor.

Locally, this is kind of a big deal, even if it is just precautionary. So I’m checking out the information about this stuff on two local news stations last night. Both of them screwed it up.

Were the screw-ups important? Depends how you look at it. But come on… this is a pretty easy one to get right.

On the one station, their mistake was on their web site. As these are usually transcriptions of what they say on air it’s possible they said it that way as well. The mistake was that they instructed people to throw away their ice if it was made before 3:30pm. That’s backwards, and if there actually is contamination and people are too stupid to think for themselves, it’s dangerous. Even so, I can see how someone typing this up might have switched the word accidentally – just bad proofreading. Still it should get fixed when people point it out (as I did in the comments section). And it would have been pretty easy, and more accurate, to just copy/paste the same paragraph I did above anyway.

On the other station, the anchors said on-air at 11pm (well after the warning, and plenty of time to research something this simple) that you can’t even use the water to bathe or wash clothes. They emphasized it, and it’s patently opposite what the warning states. During the show I posted a correction on their Facebook page and they acknowledged the mistake there. No on-air correction, but they’ve got a timed show to run, so whatever. What annoyed me was that they ran a brand new report this morning and re-stated the same mistake.

Now I get that they might want to be leaning on the more conservative side – it’s possible to accidentally ingest the water while showering, after all – so I wouldn’t be upset if they stated it more as commentary than as official news. But to repeatedly state something completely the opposite of something clearly stated in the official warning just seems wrong. Do it once, it’s a possibly innocent mistake. Keep doing it after you’ve been corrected? That’s either on purpose or poor journalism.

Either way, it bugs me. If they’re getting something this simple wrong, why should I trust they’re getting bigger stuff right?

Tags: ,

2 comments to Fact checking the easy stuff

  • “Why should I trust they’re getting bigger stuff right?”

    Ahh, there’s the problem. They probably aren’t!

    On many occasions, I think the main problem is that they report too soon before the facts are fully known even if they DID try to find out (this often happens with disasters and other breaking news), in other cases it’s shoddy reporting or poor fact checking or general ineptitude. And there are probably the odd one or two malicious misleading efforts.

    Reply to this comment

    Jeff says:

    I think you nailed it. I can’t argue with you.

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge