Posts Tagged ‘dark knight’
Tuesday, August 26th, 2008
Warner will follow Marvel model to develop new superhero films : Slice of SciFi
Superman Returns darker
Ever since Superman Returns was released, rumors were flying about the sequel. Would it happen? Would Bryan Singer return to helm it? Would anybody watch it?
Not long ago (May 7th, in fact), we were hearing that Bryan Singer would be getting Superman: The Man of Steel to theaters in 2009 with wall-to-wall action in a sequel to Returns. Personally, I was pretty happy with that news. I really think Singer knows how to pull off a movie that’s both intelligent and action-packed, and respects the source material.
But now we hear that in the wake of the success of The Dark Knight, Warner Bros. will be putting a darker focus on all its superhero properties.
For fans, this means that the sequel to “Superman Returns” won’t be happening. Instead, the studio will look to take a page from this year’s “Incredible Hulk” and reboot the franchise. Part of this is a need to freshen the franchise, but part of this can also be attributed to the fact that “Returns” struggled to make back the investment Warner Brothers put into the movie.
[...]
Mr. Robinov wants his next pack of superhero movies to be bathed in the same brooding tone as “The Dark Knight.” Creatively, he sees exploring the evil side to characters as the key to unlocking some of Warner Bros.’ DC properties. “We’re going to try to go dark to the extent that the characters allow it,” he says. That goes for the company’s Superman franchise as well.
That’s disappointing. While I get treating superhero movies as real world and serious is important in creating believability, forcing a dark tone on everything is, I think, a mistake. It’s completely appropriate for Batman, but Superman’s main character traits are hope and optimism, and a bit of naiveté (at least on the surface). It is possible to go darker with him temporarily - and I think it could be done really well - but I really think it has to be in a sequel to be good. The character has to be developed as an incorruptible, “thank God he’s here” kind of character.
Plus, I gotta imagine this new direction means a significant delay before the Boy Scout graces the screen again. So that annoys me, too.
On a side note, the linked article also mentions the other properties under development: Green Lantern, Flash, Green Arrow, and Wonder Woman. I’m excited about each of them. All could translate very well to the big screen.
Related posts
Tags: batman, Bryan Singer, dark knight, film, Flash, Green Arrow, Green Lantern, man of steel, Marvel, rumor, SciFi, superhero, superhero movies, Superman, Wonder Woman
Posted in Comics, Movies & TV, Sci-fi | No Comments »
Monday, July 21st, 2008
I don’t have it in me to write everything I think about this movie right now, but I wanted to get something down.
Just like Spider-man 2, this sequel takes an amazingly good predecessor and improves on it.
And just like in the Spider-man franchise, the key is focusing on the character’s development. Bruce/Batman learns a lot about himself and his chosen line of work - the limits, the responsibilities, and the consequences.
Heath Ledger, for anyone wondering, actually deserves the praise he’s getting for this role. It’s not a posthumous sympathy vote. I wouldn’t call myself a Heath Ledger fan, generally, but I simply can’t imagine anyone else playing this role this well.
In my last post I counted Wall-E out of Best Picture contention, despite rumors to the contrary. The Dark Knight, however, is a serious contender - if the Academy can get past the whole blind spot it has for Sci-Fi/Fantasy films.
I may come back to this later for a more thorough review.
Related posts
Tags: batman, christian bale, dark knight, fantasy, film, heath ledger, Reviews, Sci-fi, Wall-E
Posted in Comics, Movies & TV, Reviews, Sci-fi | No Comments »
Monday, July 21st, 2008
What is wrong with parents?
Today, my wife and I went to see two vastly different films, Wall-E and The Dark Knight (reviews to follow). In both films, there were families in the audience that made me want to go up to the parents and say “What are you thinking?! You have an important role to play as a parent, and you’re screwing it up!”
For the family in Wall-E, that would have been a bit of overkill, I grant you. The father was there with his two boys, probably around 5-7 years old. I don’t have any problem with kids being in that theater - in fact, I expected kids to be in attendance for that one. The problem was that the younger boy was repeatedly, and loudly, talking during the movie. I don’t blame the kid (much). He was just excited and wanted to show his dad that he understood what was going on (it’s possible that he’d seen the movie before, judging from some of what he said). The problem is that the father didn’t take the opportunity to teach the child to be quiet, and courteous to others. Eventually the brother said something to him, and then his dad chimed in, somewhat ineffectively, in telling the boy to quiet down. That’s just backwards. Why was the brother taking the lead there?
There were also a pair of older kids - teens - loudly bounding up and down the stairs and across the front of the seats, so that may have made me a bit more irritable toward the talker. But still… if the father doesn’t teach their kid to be courteous now, he’s just setting the kid up to become that bounder in a few years.
But the one that really bothered me was the family in The Dark Knight. They didn’t bother me because they were disruptive, mostly, but because they were there. These parents brought a 2 or 3 year old girl to an extremely loud, very violent movie. The second the movie started, she began to cry. And who can blame her? The noise alone was an assault to her senses! The parents didn’t take her out of the theater. They did comfort her in her seat, but come on… for the first 10 minutes of the movie, every time the audio quieted down a bit (which was not often), I could hear her crying. Eventually, that stopped, but I am still really disappointed that these people would subject their young daughter to sitting still that long (3 hours, from the time they first sat down) without relief, let alone for a film that is so clearly not something she should be seeing. It’s just wrong.
Parents have the responsibility for teaching their kids, and for protecting them - in big ways, and small ways. These examples are two of the small ways. Sometimes the small ways bother me more, because they’re easy to overlook, but add up to more problems later.
Related posts
Tags: children, dark knight, family, film, kids, responsibility
Posted in Movies & TV, Parenting | 4 Comments »
Saturday, June 21st, 2008
Back in April I wrote a list of the movies I want to see this year in the theater. So far I’ve seen all the ones I called as a must-see and missed all the others (which, so far, is just Speed Racer).
When I go to the theater, I love to see the previews. I consider them an art unto themselves. It can’t be easy to tease an unfinished movie by pulling out the enticing bits and telling you just enough to get you interested in the story without revealing the whole thing. Good editors can even make a bad movie look great. Conversely, great movies can be hidden behind a poor trailer. But a great movie with a great trailer makes you sit up and go, “wow!”
The problem with seeing all these previews is that they are essentially commercials. Commercials are made to make you want to purchase something you didn’t know you needed. They are there to separate you from your money. So for me, loving trailers is a two-edged sword.
Case in point: when we saw our double-feature, I saw trailers for movies I somehow hadn’t heard about before, and newer trailers for movies I was already somewhat interested in. Then I read Lee’s review of The Incredible Hulk. I thought I was set with my list for the summer, but now it seems I have some revision to do.
So here’s the new list, in order of release, with release date (and my thoughts, if I’ve seen it). Boldface indicates movies I will not miss in the theaters. Italics are the ones I’m going to whine about incessantly if I miss in the theater - the ones that it hurts me to not put in bold. The others I will be disappointed if I have to miss for one reason or another, but once I see them on video I’ll be okay:
- Iron Man - May 2 (review)
- Speed Racer - May 9 (judging by general reaction, glad I missed it)
- The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian - May 16 (review)
- Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull - May 22 (review)
- The Incredible Hulk - June 13 (This is so close to being in bold it’s not even funny)
- Get Smart - June 20
- Wall-E - June 27
- Hancock - July 2
- The Dark Knight - July 18
- The X-Files: I want to believe - July 25
- The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emporer - August 1
- Star Wars: The Clone Wars - August 15
- City of Ember - October 10
- Quantum of Solace (James Bond) - November 7
The astute among you (i.e., the ones who have nothing better to do but follow the minutiae of these posts) will notice that City of Ember was added to the list. Bill Murray and Tim Robbins in a sci-fi adventure movie. I love Bill Murray and Tim Robbins, and I love sci-fi adventure, but I would not be sold by that pairing. It’s on my list. That’s the power of a trailer.
Hancock has also been upgraded to painfully close to a must-see (as has Hulk). When I saw the first trailer, it looked like a fun, but relatively light, superhero movie. This most recent trailer shows that it actually has a plot of redemption and seems well formed. (And they even surpassed the whale bit for funny. Jason Bateman is perfect for this movie.)
So many movies… so little time.
Related posts
Tags: Bill Murray, chronicles of narnia prince caspian, city of ember, clone wars, crystal skull, dark knight, film, hancock, incredible hulk, indiana jones, iron man, James Bond, Jason Bateman, Reviews, Sci-fi, star wars, Summer Movie, superhero, Tim Robbins, trailer, video, youtube
Posted in Comics, Movies & TV, Reviews | 3 Comments »
Wednesday, May 7th, 2008
Lots of news and some rumors hitting the net lately… here are the best of the bunch for Sci-Fi and comics lovers:
The next Stargate SG-1 film titled Stargate: Continuum now has a July 29 DVD release date.
Marvel has announced that Iron Man 2 has been confirmed for release in 2010, in addition to a movie about Thor. Also reported: the Avengers and Captain America (with Matthew McConaughey as the lead?) in 2011.
Also announced by Marvel: an Ant Man movie, though the timeline for the film is unknown. (This is where they start to lose me… Ant Man? Seriously? I think they’re stretching to reach a mainstream audience with that one. My guess is his popularity in the Avengers movie will determine if this one really gets made.)
Iron Man, Tony Stark, will make a cameo in The Incredible Hulk.
Superman: Man of Steel will now not be delayed due to the “Justice League of America” film but is geared up for a 2009 release with Brandon Routh back as Superman.
Both Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and The Dark Knight will run over 140 minutes. In fact, The Dark Knight may run close to three hours.
Speaking of The Dark Knight, director Christopher Nolan has signed on for a third Batman feature, and Christian Bale has expressed interest as well. Details of plot are even starting to circulate - apparently the film will focus on Two-Face and may introduce Robin, following the plot of the graphic novels “The Long Halloween” and “Dark Victory” for a rough outline.
Related posts
Tags: Avengers, batman, Brandon Routh, captain america, christian bale, Comics, dark knight, dvd, film, graphic novels, Hulk, incredible hulk, indiana jones, iron man, justice league, Marvel, matthew mcconaughey, Robin, rumor, Sci-fi, Stargate, stargate sg-1, Superman, superman man of steel, Thor, Tony Stark
Posted in Comics, Movies & TV, Sci-fi | 5 Comments »
Saturday, April 26th, 2008
Lots of movies are coming out this year that I would love to see in a theater, rather than waiting for DVD.
Here’s the list, in order of release, with release date. Boldface indicates movies I will not miss in the theaters - the others I will be disappointed if I have to miss for one reason or another:
- Iron Man - May 2
- Speed Racer - May 9
- The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian - May 16
- Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull - May 22
- The Incredible Hulk - June 13
- Get Smart - June 20
- Wall-E - June 27
- Hancock - July 2
- The Dark Knight - July 18
- The X-Files: I want to believe - July 25
- The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emporer - August 1
- Star Wars: The Clone Wars - August 15
- Quantum of Solace (James Bond) - November 7
Hmmm… 13 nights of babysitting to line up, plus approximately $234 in movie tickets (assuming $9 per ticket, and that my wife will accompany me). That’s gonna screw up my budget a bit. If I keep it to the essentials, that’s still $90. At least it’s double digits.
Okay, let’s say I get discount tickets for $6 through work and go after the restrictions are lifted (which may be too difficult a wait for some of these, but let’s just assume I can hack it): cost for all = $156; cost for the essentials = $60.
Of course, that doesn’t include the concession stand….
Sometimes I hate loving movies.
Related posts
Tags: crystal skull, dark knight, film, incredible hulk, indiana jones, iron man, James Bond, movie tickets, narnia prince caspian, Personal finance, Sci-fi, speed racer, star wars, x files
Posted in Movies & TV, Personal finance | 1 Comment »
Wednesday, March 26th, 2008
The Dark Knight is coming out on July 18th. Everyone has heard of that. And I can’t wait.
But did you know about Batman Gotham Knight, the animated DVD (also downloadable) coming out on July 8th? Oh, yeah….. Batman gets the “Animatrix” treatment (well, sort of).
Yes, Kevin Conroy will once again put a voice to Gotham’s caped crusader:
Conroy set the standard for modern day Batman voices with his performance in “Batman: The Animated Series,” “The New Adventures of Batman and Robin” and “The New Batman Superman Adventures.” He reprised the role as an aging Bruce Wayne playing mentor to a new Caped Crusader in “Batman Beyond.” Animation legend and “Batman Gotham Knight” producer Bruce Timm said Conroy was the obvious choice for both widespread fan approval and to provide an overriding sense of continuity within a film in which Batman appears in so many new, visual variations.
For more on Conroy and the Gotham Knight project, read this Slice Of Sci-Fi entry.
The six anime-style stories will delve deeply into Bruce Wayne’s transition to becoming Batman. It’s not clear if the Batman Begins storyline will play any role, though I doubt it.
So July 8th, we get ahold of some great Bat-animation, just in time to stoke the flames for The Dark Knight. Until then, here’s the trailer…
Batman = cool.
Related posts
Tags: batman, christian bale, dark knight, gotham, kevin conroy
Posted in Comics, Movies & TV, Sci-fi | No Comments »
Thursday, October 11th, 2007
Apple - Trailers - The Dark Knight
I can’t believe no one told me this trailer was out.
Okay, visually it’s an extremely boring trailer. Pretty much, it’s the bat-symbol with a light show.
The voice-over, though, is cool. You get to hear the voice of the Joker. Not bad. Just a little Nicholson thrown in there - a slight homage.
This is my “can’t wait” film for 2008.
Technorati Tags: Batman, Christopher Nolan, Christian Bale, The Joker
Related posts
Tags: batman, christian bale, dark knight, film
Posted in Comics, Movies & TV, Sci-fi | No Comments »
Tuesday, August 1st, 2006
SCI FI Wire | The News Service of the SCI FI Channel
Warner Brothers announced that its upcoming sequel to 2005’s hit Batman Begins will be called The Dark Knight and will feature Heath Ledger as the Joker.
I will be there. I thought Christian Bale did an utterly fantastic job as Batman in the first movie, and I can’t wait for the sequel. I’m a little worried about Heath Ledger, but I’ll wait and see how it goes.
Related posts
Tags: batman, christian bale, dark knight, film
Posted in Movies & TV, Sci-fi | No Comments »
Loading ...