Posts Tagged ‘doctor who’

Review: Doctor Who 2008

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Let’s get this out of the way: if you stare too closely at the details of a Russell Davies’ Doctor Who story, you might fall through a plot hole and end up in a paradox. Nobody wants to be stuck in a paradox, so just go with the intent of the story and ignore some of the pesky little details that geeks love to argue about. Stick with that mindset and you’ve opened yourself up to a fun journey through series four.

In my previous reviews of the show (review 1, review 2) I thought the episodes (and the finales) kept improving from series to series. Does that hold true for the 2008 episodes?

Looking at series 4 overall, I’d have to say that episode for episode, 2008 didn’t quite live up to 2007 (series 3). On the whole, there were more great episodes last year than this year. That said, this year had some excellent stuff. I don’t think anyone would argue that the “Library” 2-parter was one of the top 3 stories ever written for Doctor Who, for example (in fact, most reviews I’ve seen would put it at number 1). It also boasted the most guest-star-filled episodes ever (with the possible exception of the original show’s “The Five Doctors” - though I’d give “Journey’s End” the edge).

Since this is Russell T. Davies’ final year as the show runner, it was built as the wrap-up to the major threads he began in 2005 when he brought the show back. Even the Ood had a sense of closure this year. As such, this series (and in particular, its finale) will probably be looked at as one of the most important of the reborn show, even if it wasn’t the best in terms of consistent quality.

Some general statements:

  • I like that Donna was not a participant in the “unrequited love” subtext that pervaded the previous years of the show. [Note to Steven Moffatt: let's have more of that! Get back to the way companions used to be handled in the original run!]
  • There were some great moments in this year. I particularly liked the Latin-to-Celtic translations bits in the Pompeii episode.
  • I loved how the finale episodes were rich with callbacks to not only this year but previous years, even including a couple references to the original show!

Best episodes:

  • As mentioned, the Library 2-parter
  • The three-part series finale
  • “The Doctor’s Daughter” and “The Fires of Pompeii” each have some important elements, but as stand-alone episodes they don’t quite make the “best” list.

Because of the nature of the finale, I must now employ my newly acquired, dimensionally transcendental spoiler saver (it is, after all, bigger on the inside — though it apparently doesn’t work in RSS, so if you’re reading this in a feed reader, stop reading here unless you want spoilers)…

Show Spoiler ▼

If you look at all 4 years as a single story, this series serves as a satisfying ending, in my opinion. There were certainly problems with it on its own, but as a piece of the larger pie, I’m happy with it.

Looking forward to the specials, and then to the full return with Moffatt in the lead.

Related posts

Quick Notes on Entertainment News

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008

I’ve fallen really behind on posting lately. Given the upcoming holiday there probably won’t be much for the next few days either. But I wanted to quickly throw a few things out there in Sci-Fi and Entertainment news.

Hobbit films (report stolen from Slice of Sci-Fi):

Director Guillermo del Toro told reporters during a Hellboy press junket that his first “The Hobbit” movie will stick strictly to J.R.R. Tolkien’s original “The Hobbit” material, however, the second film will take in a wide range of materials from the Tolkien universe inlcluding many of Tolkien’s own notes.

It will be interesting to see what happens with that second movie. Do we have a screenwriter who can take those notes and other materials and make a script that feels Tolkien-ish?

Doctor Who: Parts 1 and 2 of the season finale were extremely good. Like everyone else, I’m waiting with very little patience for the final installment (I hope the Sci-Fi channel runs it in its entirety when it’s their turn - it’s a super-sized episode at 65 commercial-free minutes). Then I intend to be very annoyed next year when we only get a few specials. I’ll do another review of the season after it’s over.

Batman Begins: Heath Ledger continues to get rave reviews on his Joker portrayal. I hope the movie lives up to the buzz.

Starship Troopers 3: Three? Really? Do we need three of these things? Wasn’t one painful enough? If you really want to see the trailer, it’s out there.

Hancock: Apparently this has a pretty short running time. And it’s getting middling reviews. Apparently the first half is pretty good, but then it falls apart. This is really driving me nuts. The more I see of clips and trailers for this, the more I want to see it, but then I find out it’s short and may not live up to expectations? I don’t know if I can throw my money and time at that. I really want to see it, though… blah.

Star Wars: Clone Wars - The new trailer is out there! It’s a bit moodier than the others. I think I liked Trailer #1 better. Still on the must see list, though.

The Prisoner: AMC is remaking 60’s TV show “The Prisoner” in a 6-part miniseries with Jim Caviezel and Ian McKellan. Top notch actors, ground-breaking original… I hope it turns out well!

Dr. Horrible’s Sing-along Blog: Joss Whedon, the creator of Buffy, Angel, and Firefly, has got himself a nice little humorous project with some familiar faces. Looks intriguing.

And finally…

Bruce Campbell, who “starred” in all three Spider-man movies and my favorite western-sci-fi TV show (The Adventures of Brisco County Jr.) - and a few well known cult classics - is coming out with a new film in which he plays himself. Sort of. Looks really good to me…

In case I’m too lazy to blog again before the weekend, have a great Independence Day (unless you happen to live in a non-US location, in which case, have a nice normal weekend.)

Related posts

Doctor Who - The return of Gallifrey?

Friday, May 9th, 2008

Doctor Who — Theories, Facts, Speculations - Slice of SciFi

Over at Slice Of Scifi, they’ve got a post (linked above) that lays out a lot of evidence gathered throughout the last 3+ seasons of the show, and comes up with this hypothesis:

Overall for the Season we will witness the return, in some form or other, of Gallifrey and learn of how the Time War really ended.

I gotta admit, that’s a real possibility, and the author lays out a decent argument. He even goes so far as to make a guess that we will see pieces of the Time War, and that the current, 10th incarnation of the Doctor has a role to play in it. Not sure I buy that, but I’m also not going to dismiss the idea out of hand. He makes a decent case for his position.

It would be a pretty cool thing to see, and it would make sense for Russell Davies to end his involvement in the show on that kind of a note (Davies is rumored to be leaving at the end of next year’s three specials, and Tennant’s tenure as the Doctor beyond that time is in question as well).

If you go through to read the article, which I recommend, be aware that there are spoilers for just about every episode from the first episode of the first season (of the reborn series) thru the fourth episode of the current season.

Related posts

Smallville, Dr. Who, and Torchwood facts and rumors

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Smallville will be back for an eighth season next year! But without Lex, and without Lana. Michael Rosenbaum and Kristen Kreuk are calling it quits after this year. Apparently they’re both open for guest spots next year, but that’s it. I’m okay with Lana leaving. I think they’ve milked that character for all it’s worth at this point. Dropping Lex, however, is a potential death knell for viewership. The interplay between Lex and Clark, and the demise of their relationship, is truly the center of this show. They’d have to find an equally compelling focal point for the series next season, and I don’t think that would be easy.

Dr. Who, as previously noted, will only have 4 specials in 2009, rather than a full season. The rumor mill continues to go back and forth as to whether David Tennant’s 10th Doctor will regenerate during those specials or after the 2010 season. Annoyingly, there seems to be agreement that we’ll be on the 11th Doctor by 2011.

Torchwood has all sorts of changes flying around the rumor mill. Apparently the “family friendly” versions of the show are doing pretty well, and they’re thinking of moving just to that format. It has not yet been renewed for a third season, so nothing is definite (what ever is?) but the word is that three of the major characters, including the show’s centerpiece, Captain Jack Harkness, will be gone. That would leave the character of Gwen and the transplanted Dr. Who companion, Martha, to run the show.

I think it’s a mistake to remove Jack. I think John Barrowman does a great job with the part, and he’s certainly an interesting character. That said, I think there are a couple ways the show could go on without him - though I still think it would suffer. Plus he’d apparently be around for guest spots.

So it’s mixed news for each show, apparently. Hmmm. Kinda leaves me rather apathetic.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

Doctor Who Takes a Vacation

Friday, September 7th, 2007

Doctor Who To Return For Fifth Season In 2010 - Slice of Scifi

I can’t say I really understand why they are doing this. Does everyone really need a full years’ break from a 13 episode series?

Still, I’m glad it will be back.

Series Four, which went into production in July 2007, will hit UK screens in Spring 2008, followed by a special episode for Christmas 2008.

In 2009 Doctor Who will return with three specials starring David Tennant, with Head Writer, Russell T Davies.

The full-length fifth series will transmit in 2010.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Related posts

Review: Doctor Who 2007

Tuesday, July 17th, 2007

Last year, I reviewed the first two seasons of the revived Doctor Who series. At the time, I said the second season finale out-did the first’s, and that was a feat. Does the third season finale trump the second’s?

Before I answer that, let’s go on a quick retrospective of the third season. In the Christmas special and the early episodes, the Doctor was dealing with the ‘loss’ of Rose. They laid it on a bit thick from time to time, but whatever. As the season continued he grew to respect Martha, and the episodes went from entertaining to totally engrossing. Seriously, the first episodes were good, but from “Human Nature” onward, there was no contest: Season Three is the season to beat. Even “Blink,” the episode with almost no appearance by the Doctor, usually one of the weakest episodes, was amazingly good. In fact, I’d rate that one as one of my favorites (here’s a good review).

So the season itself was a winner. Was the finale? Well, it was really a three-parter. Part one blew me away (after some slow pacing in the beginning). Part two was excellent. Part three, the actual finale, was amazing at times, but faltered here and there, which was pretty disappointing. One review summed it up very well:

The final half of the story almost redeems the episode as whole. For one thing, as pay-offs to season-long story arcs come into play, it actually feels natural and not forced. Davies [writer/executive producer] even goes so far as to give some payoffs to story arcs from the entire series, making the final half of the story feel like he’s saying farewell to the series and is stepping aside. And I will give the script credit — for the most part, I like the way all the pay-offs play out.

Overall, I’d say it was good. It had its problems, but I enjoyed it. The big reveal about Jack is one thing that took me completely by surprise, and I loved it. That really made me want to go back and watch a few episodes over again.

It seems like there’s a big heartache in every season finale of this show. I realize it makes for great drama (obviously I love the episodes), but maybe they could figure out a way to make it just as compelling next year with nothing but happiness at the end.

The don’t miss episodes of this season? Simple list:

  • Human Nature
  • Everything after it

Honorable mention goes to “Gridlock” for being a good episode, but mostly for having an absolutely critical scene at the end that impacts the full season story (and the series’ story, for that matter).

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Related posts

Battlestar Galactica moves to Sundays

Wednesday, November 22nd, 2006

SCI FI Wire | The News Service of the SCI FI Channel

SCI FI Channel’s award-winning series Battlestar Galactica will move to a new timeslot starting Jan. 21, 2007: Sundays at 10 p.m. ET/PT, following the premiere of the new original series The Dresden Files at 9 p.m.

When I first heard this, I thought it was a bonehead move. Suits moving things around for no good reason, and dismantling a good thing. After all, Sci-Fi had me locked in for a minimum of 3 hours every Friday night (much to my wife’s dismay) with Stargates SG-1 and Atlantis, plus a BSG kicker. Then they cancelled SG-1 and now they’re moving BSG? What does that leave me with on Fridays?! Where’s my block programming?! Now I have to be content with Atlantis and maybe Doctor Who in prime-time Friday slots. Maybe they’ll throw a Heroes rerun in there. Actually, that’s not a bad line-up, but it’s nowhere near as hard of a hit as the original Sci-Fi Friday block.

But while I still feel that pain, I’ve taken some time to think about it and it’s not that boneheaded. On any given weeknight, Sci-Fi faces serious competition from the big 4 networks. Sunday night programming across the board, however, is notoriously slim. BSG has an audience now, and it’s fanatical enough to follow the show to the new slot, so they shouldn’t lose too many viewers. At the same time, they should pick up viewers who are casting about looking for something worth watching on a Sunday night. So viewership should increase — which is really what the network game is all about.

The biggest problem I have is that when The 4400 and The Dead Zone return to USA Network, they’ll be airing on Sunday nights too (if they hold their spots). That’s a conflict I can’t reconcile. I can’t tape two shows at once with only one reliable VCR. So of course you see what NBC Universal (Sci-Fi’s parent) is forcing me to do, don’t you? That’s right: bittorrent to the rescue!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Torchwood trailer

Wednesday, October 11th, 2006

YouTube - Torchwood - First proper trailer

Someone has posted a preview trailer for Torchwood, the Dr. Who spinoff series. It’s basically a character list and some special effects, but I like the look of it. I’m still in.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Related posts

Future Imperfect: Doctor Who on Sci-Fi

Monday, August 7th, 2006

Slice of Scifi - Science Fiction TV / Movie, News, Interviews & more - Jay’s Doctor Who Update

Well, Doctor Who’s second season will air on Sci-Fi in October, as previously rumored. That’s all good news. On the other hand, the second Doctor’s debut episode, the Christmas Invasion, will be held off on Sci-Fi until the Christmas holidays.

While there is an obvious synergy in that timing, that’s really a stupid decision by the suits. The episode that sets up the new Doctor’s character is going to air near the end of the season’s run! That’s bass-ackwards, as my father would say. When are the executives at these stations going to learn to stop screwing with story progression for stupid marketing stunts?


UPDATE: Looks like the early reports were wrong! The Christmas Invasion will be shown in the initial 2-hour block kicking off the series. Apparently our benevolent Sci-Fi Channel overlords are smarter than initially thought.

Related posts

Doctor Who Season 2 on Sci-Fi

Wednesday, July 26th, 2006

Slice of Scifi - Science Fiction TV & Movie News, Interviews & more » Latest Doctor Who Rumor - It’s All Good!

Rumor has it that the second season of Doctor Who will air along with the third season of Battlestar Galactica in October on cable’s Sci-Fi Channel.

Sounds good to me! Maybe I can get my wife to watch with me.

Related posts