Caddickisms

My thoughts on everything

Random Quote:
Yes!! He CAN be taught!!
- The Genie (Aladdin)
June 19th, 2008

Fixing published audio problems in Captivate 2

I Googled my head off for help with this last night and couldn’t come up with anything, so I thought I’d put this out there for those of you who want to put your head through your monitor because Captivate is driving you insane.

Yesterday I was editing a recording I made in Adobe Captivate 2. It was only 18 frames, about 7 minutes long, and is a demo of a system we use at work. Should have been a slam dunk.

The Problem

For the most part, everything went fine until I published the file to SWF with HTML. But when I played back the published file, at about the 5th frame, the audio gained a very pronounced echo which lasted a couple frames, and then left the rest of the audio sounding like it was in a tin can.

I figured, “hmm… must be a glitch,” so I published it again. Same thing, but this time the problems happened on different frames.

I tried publishing again after changing a couple publishing settings: same effect - screwed up audio on different frames. Each time I published (about 8 times total) the audio was screwed up in a different way, and I never edited the file between publishes.

Needless to say I was a bit frustrated.

The Solution

I tossed out a rather annoyed email to a co-worker, who responded this morning with the answer (and it’s at this point that I have to say to her again: THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!).

Audio menu on Captivate 2Apparently she had run across the problem before. I don’t know how she figured it out, but the answer is to adjust the slide timing slightly using the Audio > Edit Timing… feature.

The Edit Audio Timing window lets you grab a slider indicating the start time for an effect or frame change. Grab any one of those sliders and move it slightly (my suggestion is to be more zoomed in than shown here so you really are only moving it slightly). Click OK, then republish and everything comes out fine.

Edit Audio Timing in Captivate 2

One thing you might want to do is verify that none of the timing of objects on your slides changed. It could happen, so make sure you check.

Why this works is a mystery to me, but there you have it. Hope it helps someone.

Related posts

March 10th, 2008

Oprah’s Online Training - live experience review

Well, I was on the live session tonight (read about my experience with last week’s recorded session). For the most part, as I expected, the experiences were the same. There were some bumps in the data stream early on (and once later), but it got ironed out within about 15 minutes, so I was satisfied with the transmission itself. I was very worried at the beginning because the resolution was dropping significantly at times to the point where I couldn’t make out faces. They took care of that, but then there were instances where the audio and video froze and I lost part of the conversation for 5 seconds at a time. As I said, though, those issues were pretty well hammered out quickly.

I loved that they ran segments from the previous session prior to the live session, along with a countdown to the live session. Excellent reinforcement and review, and great setting of expectation.

It’s a seriously slick production, visually, and I really wouldn’t expect any less from a TV production studio. There have to be at least 3 or 4 cameras in that studio.  I have to imagine they’re using at least the same amount of production staff for this that they use for Oprah’s TV show - probably more to accommodate the internet interface.

Overall, all of the “good and bad” points I mentioned in my last post are still valid, except the audio for the commercials, which were included in the stream - and only at the very top of the show, instead of sprinkled throughout as in the recorded session - so there was no volume incongruity.

I was disappointed that there was no back channel chat, though it can be distracting.

The interface for asking a question was imposing. You had to enter your full name, full address, email address, and phone number - all required. There was no “email” link that I saw, so it’s very possible that the producers would call you to ask your question on the phone (a possibility with which I was uncomfortable). That’s one way to cut down on the questions you get, which I suppose would be important for an audience of this size.

Oprah did plug a follow-up XM radio show immediately after the session for members with access to that. That’s pretty cool that they are extending the conversation that way, but really, as I said before, why not promote the online interactive pieces? They’re more widely available and easier to participate in.

I did spend some time on the discussion board today as well, in the Aha! section. There was certainly plenty of participation. Much of it was on point, too. There was some noise, and arguments flared up here and there, but with a topic this controversial that’s to be expected. I haven’t gotten out to the blog yet. It should be interesting to see how that’s being run.

Overall, looking at this experience from the perspective of a corporate training professional focused on online delivery, it has been an interesting ride so far. I’m picking up some ideas for how I’d like to run a program internally that I hadn’t thought through previously. The online workbook is an “aha” experience for me, for example. Don’t know why I didn’t think of that before. There are obviously some things I’m not going to be able to do - the multiple cameras and nice studio, for example (heck, even live streaming video is out of my reach at the moment) - but there are also things I think our team can do better. Structuring the sessions and moderating the discussion forums come to mind.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

March 10th, 2008

Oprah’s Online Training - experience review

I’m currently watching the recorded version of Oprah’s first session of her “class” on A New Earth, which is about “new spirituality”. For the purposes of this post, however, the topic is irrelevant. What I’m interested in is how it’s being pulled off as an example of a massive, live, online facilitated event.

This is, I believe, the single largest event of its kind (Oprah says there are over 700,000 people connected to the course), and it’s being run by people who undoubtedly have the resources to pull it off, so it will be interesting to see how it goes.

I had to download a proprietary player, which isn’t unusual for this kind of event. When I tried to get into the event (late, because I had some other commitments) for the live broadcast, everything launched, except the video/audio. Later I found out that was a common issue, because they ran into issues with so many people simultaneously trying to access the ‘class’. Nice to know the huge boys (not just the big boys) have the same problems we all do.

So I gave up.

Now I’ve gone back and am watching the recorded version in preparation for part 2, which begins tonight. I’m actually glad I got blocked out, because now I get to contrast the live vs recorded experience. As for the recorded experience:

The good

  • I’m getting no problems with the video or audio. Very smooth. Very clean. (I’m running through a cable modem, and the player reports I’m getting 706kpbs.)
  • The integration of Skype video phones is nice, and done very cleanly. (There’s a whole production staff making that integration happen, I’m sure, but the technology is out there and available.)
  • The presentation style is obviously interview, call-in show style, which is pretty engaging, though it’s still a presentation and not an interactive format (well, there are punctuations of interactivity for individuals, but not group-wide interaction). Still, I can understand doing that for an initial session. It doesn’t hurt that the presenter is an extremely talented and experienced interviewer (Oprah).
  • Nice integration of the callers’ inputs - Skype phone, phone, and email (though it’s funny that there was apparently a problem with getting an email to Oprah’s private screen at one point).
  • Extra-session activities: this is where the whole thing really gets exciting. Behind the “Talk with Others” link on the player, you get to a page that points you to discussion boards, a course-focused blog, and a way to find local reading groups. There are even links to specific discussions (Favorite Quotes, and Aha! Moments, specifically) to really focus your involvement for those who aren’t comfortable just browsing through aimlessly. This is such an important part of the experience - this is where the interaction and personal investment pays off, and likely where the most actual learning occurs. Providing these tiered ways to get involved (watching, reading, commenting, discussing) is what is going to make this a success.
  • Workbooks and exercises: Questions are presented, suggestions for ways to apply the concepts are given, and there is a place for you to respond and record your thoughts privately, in addition to the public outlets. It’s a directed study-guide. So important.

The bad

  • Commercials. Don’t put commercials in my classes. It makes it feel even more like a TV show.
  • Lack of audio control (or consistency of audio) for the commercials. I have my computer’s audio turned up because of some other audio programs I use. I turned the volume down on the course player to an acceptable level. When the commercials come on, there are no controls, and the audio jumps back to default levels. The first time that happened it almost blew my ears off.
  • Not mentioning the “extra session” materials during the session (except for one off-handed mention of the discussion boards). An orientation to the overall structure of the course, not just the presentation, would have been a great add to the first session. That’s a lost opportunity that could have helped involve those who are a little less internet savvy. Tell me how to get involved and make the most of the experience!
  • Along the same lines - the lack of an agenda hurt as well. I’d like to see an agenda for the overall class (i.e., topics for each of the 10 sessions), as well as an agenda for each session. How long is the setup/intro? How long are we going to have for Q&A?
  • The lack of live interactive moments: polls, for example, would have been of tremendous use in this session. There may be ways to get more interactivity that aren’t obvious in the recorded session (back-room chats, for example), but I’ll have to wait to see if they do that tonight.

Those are my thoughts on the recorded experience. We’ll see how it differs from the live experience I (hopefully) have tonight.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

February 15th, 2008

I’m a casualty of war

My company has recently shut down all access to YouTube. I get that. I completely believe that many people are using company time and bandwidth to watch all sorts of inappropriate — or just plain time wasting — content. From a certain perspective, I can support the decision to prevent that from happening.

There is a war between those who would waste company time and resources, and those who are tasked with keeping that from happening.

I am collateral damage.

Part of my job within the training department is to research new content creation and distribution technology, and to integrate that into our training delivery. YouTube is, for better or worse, an important part of that responsibility for two main reasons:

  1. It is itself one of the most popular examples of that new technology.
  2. Due to it’s popularity, it is used by many other people to showcase their own discoveries and new uses for content and distribution technology - thereby making it a valuable resource for me to do my job.

Information sharing is critical to my job. The ability to see what other people are doing/have done in converging technology and training is a significant way for me to not keep reinventing the wheel. The ability to create and deliver training products that appeal to a culture steeped in these new technologies requires me to have access to these technologies to begin with.

Is YouTube the only way for me to keep up with these advancements and new ideas? Not at all — far from it, actually. For example, blogs are actually a great source for these ideas as well (in fact, here are two that I keep a sharp eye on: e-Learning Technology, and Corporate e-Learning Strategies and Development). The interesting thing about these blogs, though, is that they frequently use embedded movies from YouTube as examples of what they are talking about! I can’t see these things when I’m inside the Corporate firewall, so I’m missing a significant portion of the point!

I’ve also used YouTube videos to help me explain the concepts and technology that I am trying to ’sell’ internally. For example, I used this video to help me showcase the concept of a wiki - and even embedded it in my wiki for the pilot group to see. Now it’s just an unexplained blank space on the page because the video is blocked.

That same video, and others like it, are also good examples I can use with our training team to help think about other ways to create training that may appeal more to a large portion of our employee base. Now I can’t share those examples anymore.

Collaboration, sharing, and openness - that’s where we should be going. That’s what would help us work more efficiently, smarter, and more effectively, in many cases. But the barriers to doing this at a large organization (like mine) are hard to overcome. There are times it feels like I’m fighting an uphill battle. This is just the latest setback.

Blah.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

February 8th, 2008

Replace Adobe Captivate for free?

Wink - [Homepage]

Just ran across this free application that could be a replacement for Adobe Captivate, if you’re looking for a quick and dirty way to create software demos. Did I mention it’s free?

Just from the screenshots and incredibly short example, it looks like it does a pretty good job, but isn’t as polished looking as Captivate.

I haven’t tried it yet, but I plan to soon. It might be a decent alternative for Subject Matter Experts who need to do something as a one-off, rather than purchasing a Captivate (or similar tool) license for them.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

January 7th, 2008

Tips from CommonCraft

I’m pretty impressed with the CommonCraft videos. They’ve found a way to make YouTube a marketing and profit center for themselves, and a lot of their work is in the training and marketing industries. They’ve found a nice niche for themselves.

One of their recent blog entries catalogs some lessons learned in their previous year of business. I’ve pulled a few of the tips out below that I think apply to a training department - especially one that focuses on e-learning.

Simple is better. Approach an explanation by removing information instead of adding it. Remember Occam’s Razor.

Production values and ideas are often at odds. Flashy graphics and cool music are sometimes a poor replacement for a good idea. Spend time focusing on the message.

It’s not always about how it works - it’s about why anyone should care. The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference (Elie Weisel). The path to a solid explanation is making people care as a first priority.

We all need a little more levity. Unstuff your shirt and make people laugh. Look foolish. Defy convention and do not take yourself too seriously.

Think about how those tips might apply to your business. Are you focused on the ‘how’ at the expense of the ‘why’? Can you afford to inject a bit of humor? Are you all glitz and no substance? Are getting too deep into the details?

That last question really hits home for me. I’m a detail person. I have a hard time writing a short email when I’m trying to make a point, and frequently provide more detail than is really necessary. Many times I’d probably be better served to provide more high-level information and let the recipient ask for more if necessary. In the same way, I’m wondering if we sometimes provide too much detail in our training sessions? Should we instead move some of the detail into performance support tools? Obviously that’s not an across the board answer, but it’s something we should be thinking about when designing sessions, whether online or in the classroom.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Related posts

November 19th, 2007

Corporate Learning conference: Day 3

I managed to get to David Snowden’s talk this morning about, essentially, the nature of learning. What does science say about how we learn? Is that different from the way we, as trainers, try to make people learn?

It seems that we are trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. And what we’re ending up doing is, sometimes painfully, reshaping the hole (the trainees) to become square, rather than filing our peg (the training) to become round.

Snowden (and his data) suggests that there is a point at which fragmented information, couched in the right amount of ambiguity, provides the optimal learning opportunity. This is in contrast to “ordered” systems, which provide things like Best Practice documents, Six Sigma (for which he seems to have a special disdain), and other detailed efforts that treat humans as if they were computers or machinery.

There is much that Snowden brings to the table for discussion. It’s a fundamental shift in how we currently act in many companies. I agree with much of his thoughts, though how to actually implement his ideas elude me (though to be fair to myself, I haven’t had much time to think about it, either). At a minimum, selling them to the corporation would be a challenge.

I found the presentation to be very conceptual/theoretical, and not so much implementation strategies.  He mentioned he has a degree in philosophy, and it shows… but that’s not really a bad thing. We need someone to bring this stuff up and challenge the status quo - which is in many cases blindingly obviously broken.

You can access the recorded session (you may have to register first - not sure) at the conference’s wiki (once it’s posted). It’s deep in psychology and cognitive theory, and jargon filled, but worth it - especially the first 20 minutes, which lays the foundation of his theory. I’ll need to go back and listen to that part again. I wasn’t taking good enough notes during the live presentation.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Related posts

November 17th, 2007

Links from Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovations Day 1

The free online conference for Corporate Learning started on Thursday (it continues next Monday and Tuesday). So far, I’ve only been able to attend two sessions, one presentation on Web/Learning 2.0, and one Q&A/Discussion session following up on that presentation, both led by Tony Karrer. Unfortunately, I missed everything on Friday. Good thing it’s all being recorded!

I thought it was really a good way to do things, though my schedule wasn’t cleared as well as I had planned, so I had a couple of interruptions. That’s the downside of attending a session at your desk - people can still find you.

I found it challenging to pay attention to the back-channel chat as well as the main presentation. My brain couldn’t keep up with the discussion in both modes simultaneously. That difficulty became a topic we discussed in the second session, and about which Tony subsequently blogged. I’m not sure what the solution is, because I think the chat, moderated correctly, adds a significant amount of content that can be reviewed, and extended, later.

Good points and discussion all around, though. Below are the links I pulled from the sessions. Thanks to all who shared! Hopefully I’ll get some time soon to really look at each site and post my thoughts.

Learning/Web 2.0 tools overviews:

Wiki Adoption:

Social Learning (and example of Ning): http://sociallearning.ning.com/

Wiki for Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovations: http://www.complexive.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Discussion board for Corporate Learning Conference: http://conference.collabhost.com/logon.do

Technorati Tags: ,

Related posts

October 8th, 2007

Free Online Corporate Learning Conference

Free Online Conference - Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovations : eLearning Technology

I am impressed. This is a great example of putting your money where your mouth is. Tony Karrer and George Siemens (and their respective companies) are putting together an online conference for the Learning industry. Some of the top names in the industry will be presenting. And it’s free. All you need to do is register.

Did I mention it’s free? Pulling these people together for a live conference would normally cost you, the attendee, a pretty penny - but not this time.

Quality? Well, I’m sure from a content perspective we have nothing to fear. I don’t necessarily agree with all of them but most of the presenters are among the top thought leaders. Technically…. I’m sure there will be an issue here or there; there always is with technology. And though I could be mistaken, I don’t think anyone’s done anything at this scale before (I’m assuming it will be rather hugely attended).  But I also anticipate those issues will not be widespread.

I love that they’re using free tools to work the announcement and registration process, and for getting user involvement: a blog, a wiki, and email list software are all the components I’ve seen so far. It’s a great example, and a great experiment. Using the wiki to gather discussion ideas is a great idea. I’ve even fixed a typo in Jay Cross’ discussion topic question (you’re welcome, Jay).

I’ll definitely be there. In fact, if possible I’d like my whole team to take part in at least some of it.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

October 6th, 2007

Corporate Gaming: Recruiting and training

Corporate eLearning Strategies and Development: eLearnDevCast New Episode with Karl Kapp - GGG4L - Recruiting Gamer Generation

I just listened to a discussion between Brent Schlenker and Dr. Karl Kapp about part of Dr. Kapp’s book (Gadgets, Games, and Gizmos for Learning) where he covers recruiting the “Gamer” generation.

There are some great takeaways from that conversation for me. For example, they were talking about how far into the future companies have to think now to retain competitiveness in recruiting. For example, they were talking about a group focused on science and technology that have to market their fields to middle school students, because middle school grades determine which math classes you take in high school, and that determines what you’re able to take in college. If they don’t grab the kids attention in those early grades, they likely won’t have the background or interest in the field to become productive employees in relevant companies 10 years or more down the line. Developing games that educate in those fields and are engaging and entertaining is one powerful way to start attracting the attention of those potential employees.

The kinds of games I’m talking about here aren’t marketing a specific company, by the way. They’re teaching concepts, facts, and processes that the sponsoring company would find useful. Business concepts, analysis, cost projection, and such are at the basis of popular games like “Roller Coaster Tycoon”. My brother spends most of his time in Madden Football (at least I think it’s Madden) building his team, working with the budget for the stadium, making choices about concessions and tracking attendance, rather than playing the actual football games. He’s making business decisions and having loads of fun doing it.

That’s obviously a long-term strategy. In the short term, what a lot of recruits are looking for now is a company that will provide some kind of engaging networking or socialization opportunity. In fact, it’s something they frequently expect, having grown up with the ability to network through MySpace or Facebook, and to share their knowledge and experiences in different online venues such as blogs, discussion boards, or wikis. At a bare minimum, just the ability to create a personal profile on the corporate intranet might give one company the edge over another, all other things being equal.

That knowledge sharing ability, by the way, would serve not just as a recruiting tool but as a way to capture the experience and knowledge of workers. That’s a hot topic in all corporate circles as people leave for other jobs or retirement - as things stand now, most of the time those years of experience walk out the door with them.

Let’s look at a concrete example of some of this stuff. I work for a very old, very successful printing company. Honestly, we don’t have much of this stuff. We have the same worries that every other company has, though: how do we retain the knowledge of retiring workers? how do we recruit people who have the skills we need when interest in those skills is waning in the general population? How do we keep people once we’ve got them? How can we maximize the knowledge of workers in one part of the company and transfer some of that knowledge to the people who need to support them, or who will eventually take over their roles? How can we manage all this and still remain profitable in an extremely competitive business landscape?

Well, a relatively low cost improvement we could make is some kind of networking software, similar to Facebook. Heck, we could even use Facebook. That would certainly be useful for many of the knowledge workers we have - the ones most likely to be at a computer for a large majority of the day - but would likely be an incentive and possibly productivity tool for at least some of the more labor intensive positions as well. Most people have access to a computer at some regular interval in their lives - even if they don’t have time during their normal work day, many people log on at night and who knows… they might just take a few minutes and check in on some information or answer a question from someone. We’ll never know if we don’t give them the opportunity.

What about skilled laborers? Let’s take a look at Press Operators. These people are responsible for an entire press. Millions of dollars worth of equipment and product, and it’s their job to make sure it all works accurately and efficiently, and produces a high quality product. They have to know how to work technology, understand color theory, process, mathematics, and mechanics. They not only have to understand these from a technical perspective, they have to have an “eye” for color. It’s a complicated job. We have excellent press simulators that let operators train on how to make adjustments and generally work the press, but those are expensive to run and from what I understand only concentrate on the functions of the press itself. What if we made a game - even one that could be sold commercially - that could teach the concepts and processes around the entire position? It could easily be made to be as engaging as something like Roller Coaster Tycoon. It could be used for general recruitment purposes, similar to what I mentioned above, or as more of an introductory training tool. As you successfully deal with one job, the customer gives you more and your reputation grows and you grow more popular and get more contracts, and now you really have to start working on efficiency and minimizing downtime and getting those magazines (or books, or whatever) out the door. Really show the impact your position has on the general welfare of the company. It could be a very powerful game.

There is so much to discuss in this area that books have been written about it. Heck, whole conferences have been convened around the topics. Hopefully I get excited enough, and find enough time, to continue writing my thoughts about it later - after all, this kind of stuff is a part of my job, albeit a part that seems to keep getting lost in the daily drudgery. For now, my kids have awakened from their naps and I have to get back to my weekend.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts