Posts Tagged ‘spoilers’

TV updates: 24 and Smallville (w/spoilers)

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

The networks released their schedules for next year this week. No surprise: Smallville and 24 are both reappearing in the schedules. However, there has been surprising news/rumors about both shows…

24

Jack is back, and as an appeasement from the long wait since last season, we get a 2-hour movie on November 23rd:

24 is also scheduled to return full time in January of 2009. (A spoiler is below.) However, to reward fans who have not seen a new episode since May of 2007, there will be a 2-hour special on 11/23. According to Kiefer Sutherland, they are scheduled to start filming in the next few weeks in south Africa.

“Set and shot on location in Africa, Jack Bauer battles an international crisis, while here at home the nation prepares for a new president on inauguration day. Taking place just a few months before the new day dawns, this story will set the stage and raise the stakes for Season Seven.”

Day/Season 7 spoiler: Tony’s back. Wait a minute… is this a sci-fi show now?

Smallville

We already knew that Kristen Kreuk and Michael Rosenbaum were leaving the show as regulars. Apparently, that fact gave Allison Mack, who plays Chloe Sullivan, the guts to try renegotiating, since that would leave her as the only regular (other than Tom Welling) to have been on since the beginning. However, it looks like those negotiations may be going poorly, and Chloe may be on her way out.

So that would leave just Clark, Lois, and Jimmy as the only regulars. Hmm…. seems like we’re really leaving Smallville behind and just going straight to Superman. I don’t know - I really like the show, but I’m really worried that it’s going to suffer greatly without Lex. I’ve heard Lana will become recurring…. and I don’t care. She’s over, as far as I’m concerned. They ran out of good stuff to do with her character a few years ago. She only really had a couple good episodes in the last few seasons. Lex is the one that’s got to come back from time to time, if you ask me. Besides….

SPOILERS FOR SMALLVILLE SEASON 7 FINALE

… what are they going to do, leave him dead under the ice, buried in his attempt to kill Clark? Obviously Clark will be back somehow, and I really hope the season premiere resolves the whole Clark/Lex fight adequately. I kind of feel like the rug was pulled out from under me for this finale, and not in a good way. This show has had some great finales, but this one just seemed a bit anti-climactic to me. We saw almost the entire end of the show in the previews! Where was the big fight? Where was the surprise? Where was the “holy cow! Who’s gonna survive this?” moment? We know Clark’s going to survive so no drama there. Lex is going to survive somehow too (to do otherwise would really be a kick in the face to the fans). Lana healed (whoopie.) and left (Yeah!), though she’s open to come back (eh.). Jimmy and Lois were never in danger. Chloe was the candidate for cliffhanger-ness, but they gave her a totally happy ending. I guess Kara is still floating out there…

…but that leaves me with another question: what was the deal where Kara/Brainiac collapsed at the end of the previous episode after Kara’s “return”. It would have worked if Brainiac were controlling her, but if it’s really Brainiac, what’s with the weak collapse, and then all powerful for the opening of this episode?

Next season’s premiere better pull out all the stops, as I assumed this finale would.

Related posts

Doctor Who - The return of Gallifrey?

Friday, May 9th, 2008

Doctor Who — Theories, Facts, Speculations - Slice of SciFi

Over at Slice Of Scifi, they’ve got a post (linked above) that lays out a lot of evidence gathered throughout the last 3+ seasons of the show, and comes up with this hypothesis:

Overall for the Season we will witness the return, in some form or other, of Gallifrey and learn of how the Time War really ended.

I gotta admit, that’s a real possibility, and the author lays out a decent argument. He even goes so far as to make a guess that we will see pieces of the Time War, and that the current, 10th incarnation of the Doctor has a role to play in it. Not sure I buy that, but I’m also not going to dismiss the idea out of hand. He makes a decent case for his position.

It would be a pretty cool thing to see, and it would make sense for Russell Davies to end his involvement in the show on that kind of a note (Davies is rumored to be leaving at the end of next year’s three specials, and Tennant’s tenure as the Doctor beyond that time is in question as well).

If you go through to read the article, which I recommend, be aware that there are spoilers for just about every episode from the first episode of the first season (of the reborn series) thru the fourth episode of the current season.

Related posts

Review: Superman Returns :: Spoilers!!

Tuesday, July 4th, 2006

This is a follow-up to my previous, spoiler-free post. I have a few observations about continuity problems in Superman Returns.
Spoilers below! If you want to read it, take your mouse and click & drag from here until the end of the post.

In Superman II, Lois and Clark sleep together. In this movie Lois has a son, Jason, who is presumably five years old and who turns out to be Superman’s son. However, she is with another man, Richard, and apparently both he and Lois believe Jason to be Richard’s. Given that she doesn’t remember her tryst with Clark, that’s believable — except of course for the timing. She’d have had to have gotten over Superman really quickly to not know that Jason wasn’t Richard’s son. And Richard would have to be a moron, too. And if she did know that Jason is not Richard’s, who did she think the father was?

At the end of the movie, Lois seems to accept that Jason is Superman’s son without too much surprise. That’s a big leap considering that for all she knew, she never actually had sex with him. Okay, so maybe when Jason threw the piano across the room, the shock popped the memory block she had. I can believe that — except that it would mean she also knew that Superman and Clark are the same person. There’s nothing contradicting that in the movie, but I have a hard time believing they’re going to allow that memory to surface.

This isn’t really a spoiler, but I wonder if they’re going to address the fact that Superman no longer has any Kryptonian crystals, because they are now floating in space.

This is really a spoiler for the original movie, but it’s repeated in this one: Jor-El says that Clark will age more slowly than humans, however he seems to grow from a youth to an adult in the same timeframe as humans. I’d be able to work with that, though, if Jor-El hadn’t also said that by the time Clark heard the message, Krypton would have been destroyed for “thousands of your years,” implying that the trip from Krypton to Earth and the 13-18 years spent on the Kent farm was over a thousand years long. So it took him thousands of years to reach an apparent 6 or so year old size, and then he shot up into adulthood at a normal rate? That’s tough to swallow.

None of these things really impact my enjoyment of the movie, but they do cause some problems with continuity when you sit down and think about it.

Related posts