Posts Tagged ‘star trek’

Star Trek – title recitation record

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

So this guy named all the episodes of classic Star Trek in 1:39 at a World Record Appreciation Society event… apparently setting a record.

Eh… no big deal. That’s just relatively simple memorization (albeit a long list). I’ve got a friend who can name the title of every episode within 13 seconds of the start of the teaser – usually way faster – which is just about long enough for the planet to show up on screen and the Enterprise to begin it’s orbit.

Mike…. take this guy down!

Related posts

Tuesday TubeWatch: Death Star Trek Wars

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

That is some seriously well-integrated CGI. I love it.

The Stormtrooper’s “Boo-ya” at the end kills me.

To be a total geek, here, I gotta say that a beam meant to take out a planet would not stop at taking out one ship, though. And what’s the Enterprise doing just sitting there? Fishing? Totally unrealistic. ;)

Related posts

Review: Star Trek

Sunday, May 10th, 2009
The Enterprise leaving the station

The Enterprise leaving the station

Reviewing Star Trek (2009) is a bit of a difficult task. There is so much that has gone before, both good and bad, that it’s hard to not place this film within the context of everything “Trek.” It has a rather difficult job to fulfill in that it must honor that larger context while at the same time completely reinventing the franchise for a new time and a wider audience. And it’s an ‘origin’ story. It begs to be looked at both as an entity unto itself, and as a part of a larger whole.

So that’s what I’m going to try to do. Today’s review is a “two-fer.”

Note: I’m not even going to try to do this without spoilers, so here’s a quick thought before I get started — the movie works. It’s not perfect, but it’s well worth seeing.

Review 1: Stand-alone

The USS Kelvin in the opening battle

The USS Kelvin in the opening battle

Star Trek comes out of the gates with guns blazing as George Kirk takes command of the Federation Starship USS Kelvin, following the death of its captain at the hands of a mysterious and ruthless enemy. His first command ends in flames as he rams the ship into the invader’s vessel in order to buy time for his crew to escape, one of which is his wife, who is simultaneously giving birth to his son, James Tiberius Kirk. It is a great multi-layered opening scene full of action, tension, drama, and emotion.

This is followed by a virtually useless scene in which a young James Kirk drives a car off a cliff and mouths off to a cop. It’s pointless, destructive, and rebellious, which is exactly what Kirk’s life has apparently become, but this is all covered much more effectively in a later scene, which makes this a waste of a couple of minutes. I’m shocked it didn’t end up on the cutting room floor.

And that’s the biggest problem with this movie. The vast majority of it is really excellent (though the opening scene is the best, for my money), but every once in a while that’s punctuated with a “where’d that come from?” moment. Thankfully there aren’t many, but there are enough, in my opinion, to bump my excitement down a notch. It’s a small notch, but it’s worth mentioning.

Other things that didn’t work well with me were an overuse of the “shaky cam” style during battle scenes, coupled with external battle shots that were reminiscent of the Battlestar Galactica style of camera work, and an under-use of the villain, Nero. The last can be excused when you look at the film as hero-focused, rather than villain-focused, but still, it would have been nice to get more on that character than we did (more on Nero in Review 2).

What did work for me, though, was just about everything else. This was really a movie about Kirk and Spock’s friendship being forged, and there it succeeded. Both characters are rebels in their own way, and their stories are built well, with their initial animosity toward each other turning to mutual respect by the end. McCoy, though perhaps overacted a bit, complements the two nicely and is an interesting character in his own right.

The action scenes were well paced and exciting, the effects were top-notch, and the story was easy to follow without sacrificing its large scope.

It’s a fun action ride, and the obvious kick-off to a franchise that will leave you wanting to see the sequel. It’s also worth seeing in the theater.

Review 2: In Context

First of all, this movie does the impossible. It justifies a complete rewrite of everything you know about Star Trek without negating all that has come before. In fact, it even specifically preserves a piece of it.

Guess who doesn't make it back to the ship...

Guess who doesn't make it back to the ship…

Despite the fact that this is not your father’s Star Trek, it was obviously written with the fans in mind and with great respect for what came before. There are numerous references to the classic series. “I’m a doctor, not a…” “I’m giving her all she’s got!” and “I have been, and always shall be your friend” come immediately to mind. The Red Shirt bought it in style, and with attitude, too. That was actually played for a laugh, assuming you knew the joke.

The fact that Nero, the Romulan with a vendetta against the Federation, and Spock (old version), the Federation ambassador to Romulus, were from the future in the established timeline we all know and love was a stroke of genius. They even explain this during the film (rather obviously speaking to the fans in the audience). When Nero came back and destroyed the Kelvin, it created an alternate timeline. Not a change to the original timeline, which would have created a paradox, but an offshoot. This accomplishes two things: not only does it allow the movie to create its own version of events from that time forward – which it does unabashedly – but (somewhat less obviously) it allows the existing timeline to continue unmolested. If someone were to come along with another Next Generation story, for example, they could still do that and incorporate the events that Spock and Nero describe that caused Nero to go on his rampage within the original timeline. In a very real way, this movie is a sequel, not a prequel. These events follow, by necessity, events that take place after Star Trek: Nemesis. Take a moment and wrap your mind around that.

Now that they can change events with impunity, the writers do just that. When Vulcan is destroyed, for example, Spock is devastated at the loss of his home and people. As fans, we’re in disbelief with him. It throws us off, and truly makes us wonder if some members of the beloved crew may not make it. After all, they just took out one of the most important planets in Federation history. Maybe Chekov or Uhura won’t make it, either.

As a result of their losses – Kirk’s father, and Spock’s mother and home planet – our two main characters are a bit edgier versions than they would otherwise be. Thus, this version of Star Trek is heavier on the action, and lighter on the social commentary. To be honest, it did feel that something was missing. I’m a little conflicted on whether that is a good or bad thing, though.

Scotty was played more for comic relief in this version, though I loved the character anyway. Each of the characters had their comic relief moments, though, as they were each new to their positions and made some rookie mistakes. Those were fun to see. I think they played it up a little too much with McCoy’s fumbling over Kirk’s side-effects to the vaccine he gave Kirk, but there were good moments within that bit, too. Speaking of McCoy, I love that we finally get to hear where he got the nickname “Bones.”

One thing that may not feel satisfying to those who know the Star Trek universe is the explanation of Nero’s motivations. The destruction of Romulus and the involvement of the Federation and Spock, specifically, is sketched out during the film, but not to the extent it should have been. To be fair, there was no time to do it justice within the film in a way that fans would want. To those who are looking for more, I heartily recommend the lead-in graphic novel “Star Trek: Countdown” as a great backstory to flesh out the Nero character more and create a much tighter bridge between the post-Nemesis universe and this film. It’s a great story, and pulls in some Next Generation characters amidst the transformation of Nero from peaceful, helpful miner to raving, grief-stricken lunatic murderer. The downside of reading it, for me, was that I wanted to see more out of Nero in the film itself.

Overall Reaction

With all the changes to the original timeline and looking at the film as an opening to an essentially new franchise, what do I think of it? It may seem like a lot of complaining above (and to be honest, I’m enough of a geek that I could continue to nitpick all day), but I had a really good time watching this film. It wasn’t without its problems, but it really was good. I’m very interested to see what they’ll do in a sequel now that they have the new versions of these characters established and don’t have to work as hard to satisfy fan expectations. They did what they needed to do with this film: win a huge number of new fans without loosing many of the old fans. The field’s wide open now for new stories. I’m ready to boldly go into this newly re-opened frontier.

Hopefully you’ve seen it. If you haven’t, go check it out, then come back here and let me know what you thought.

Related posts

Watchmen, Star Trek, and Star Wars (sort of)

Friday, March 6th, 2009

(Grab your pacemaker, it looks like I’m making two posts in two days! Will the madness ever end?)

A few things came to my attention today that I just couldn’t wait to pass on.

First of all, as you undoubtedly know, Watchmen opened today. No surprise there. But did you know these stats?

  • 90% of all Fandango’s weekend ticket sales has been for Watchmen.
  • IMAX’s website crashed four times this week due to the increased traffic of people looking for information on Watchmen IMAX showings.
  • The movie breaks the record for the most “playdates” for an R-rated film, according to Hollywood Reporter.
  • 1600 locations had midnight showings last night. Compare that to 656 midnight showings for that other Zack Snyder film, 300.

Apparently there is some demand for this movie. :)


While I’m on the topic of Watchmen, I saw a review of the film in the NY Times today. The reviewer didn’t seem to find the film relevant. As I thought about it, he probably has a point. It is set in 1985, during the Cold War, and it does help to get into that mindset when reading the graphic novel. I’d imagine the film to be the same way. So keep that in mind as you make your way to the multi-plex.

Oh, and I thought of something as I was looking at some of the commercials for the film today. I’m a little worried that they might strip a bit of the realism away from the physicality of the superheroes in the film. In the book, they were mostly just regular people who got this notion into their heads to put on a costume and fight crime. No super-strength, no amazing feats of acrobatics, just people trying to help. For example, in the book, there’s a scene where Nite Owl II and Silk Spectre save some people from a building fire. They land on the roof, run down the stairs, and lead the people back to their ship. In the clip I saw, Silk Spectre leaps from the hovering “Owl Ship” crashes through the roof, and lands cleanly in the top floor hallway. More visually stunning, definitely, but people can’t do that, really. That’s one of the things that set the book apart—its treatment of the heroes (except for Dr. Manhattan) as people who didn’t necessarily have a special physical skill, just a need to help as best they could. Nite Owl II even seemed a bit flabby in some panels, which would be appropriate for someone who was not keeping in shape during his “retirement.”

So while that exaggeration probably won’t keep me from enjoying the film, it is a bit disappointing that they’re apparently ignoring one of the central (IMO) conceits that made the graphic novel unique.


Star Trek has released its third trailer! Take a look at the goodness:

(YouTube is okay and all, but you really ought to see it at the Official Site, or even better, in HD from Apple’s site.)

This one delves a little more into the character and drama than the others (backed up by some dramatic music), and I got a better sense of the early part of the story. And it has, apparently, a planet being swallowed by a black hole weapon. That was just cool. Very nice.

You also get a better sense that the actors are not just doing impersonations of the characters previous interpretations—they’re bringing themselves to the roles. As much as that may grate on some fans, I think that’s a good thing. These actors need to inhabit these characters themselves, not channel some other actors. That never goes well.

Also, I think the battle scenes in this are going to completely blow away any Federation battles we’ve seen to date. I hope I’m right.


Finally, I mentioned in a previous post that the Family Guy crew is going to do a sequel to their “Blue Harvest” send-up of Star Wars IV: A New Hope, focusing on The Empire Strikes Back. The title will be “Something Something Something Dark Side,” which I think is kind of lame, but a little better than “Blue Harvest” (I never really understood that title… can someone explain?). It will debut in the fall.

It’s also been announced, though it’s not too surprising, that they’re already working on a third installment to spoof Return of the Jedi.

Related posts

Tuesday TubeWatch: Super Bowl Movie Roundup

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

If you were the head of a movie company, which movies would you choose to spend $1.5 million per 30 seconds to advertise during the Super Bowl—an event watched primarily by people who like to watch men running and slamming into each other? Let me give you a hint: it wouldn’t be Wendy and Lucy.

No. You get action. You get slow motion beatings and martial acrobatics. You get fast cutting, adrenaline pushing excitement and special effects so good they’ll burn your eyes out if you stare at them too long.

Consider yourself warned. These things are so good they hurt.

My top three picks for best movie commercials aired during the Super Bowl are…

Star Trek

Transformers 2: Rise of the Fallen

GI Joe (which turns out to look way better than I expected it would)

Also interesting, but a distant runner up:

Race to Witch Mountain (I liked the Witch Mountain movies as a kid)

Related posts

Catch up on Sci-fi news

Thursday, November 27th, 2008

A few things that are now probably old news for some of you have come across my reader. Sorry I didn’t get to pass them on earlier. I done been busy.

So this’ll be just a quick list for the most part.

The next Family Guy: Blue Harvest special will parody Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back. There will also be an upcoming Family Guy episode that features a Star Trek crew:

“In one episode, Stewie kidnaps the cast of “Star Trek: The Next Generation.” They (the original cast members) all came back, reunited to do their voices for us,” McFarland teased.

NBC’s My Own Worst Enemy has been cancelled. The 8th episode may be the last to be seen, as the show was cancelled during production of it’s 9th episode. Personally I think they should let it run through the 13 shows originally ordered, but I can understand this show not catching on. It’s no Journeyman. Given more time, though, I could see the overarching plot twisting a bit in interesting directions. Still… there’s something not quite satisfying about it. Maybe it’s that the two main characters can never actually meet, so their arguments are always indirect. Christian Slater, though, does a great job of separating the two characters.

Doctor Who: Big news here is that David Tennant is leaving the show at the end of 2009’s specials. That hurts. He’s really great. He’ll be a tough act to follow, I think… but then I thought that after Christopher Eccleston, too, and that turned out great. Other old, but disappointing news is that the rumored multiple Doctors Children-in-need special didn’t happen, but instead featured the opening clip from this year’s Christmas special “The Next Doctor”. I don’t think this is the actor who will be taking over for Tennant, but it looks interesting:

Something on Battlestar Galactica has surfaced. The trailer for the last half of the final season for the show is out. Looks good.

And remember that Star Trek trailer that was released last week? A new version of it was released with a single small but significant change. Nimoy’s Spock stops in to drop a few familiar words:

Live long, and prosper

Live long, and prosper

Well, that’s it for now. Maybe next time I’ll have news on things that haven’t been reported to death already. :)

Related posts

Star Trek (2009) full trailer released

Tuesday, November 18th, 2008
Kirk and Spock over the Enterprise

Kirk and Spock over the Enterprise

First off, if you haven’t yet, go see the trailer. This one is worth the HD download. It’s pretty.

Okay, back already? Good.

Looks pretty good, don’t it?

I’m not going to obsess over the details here. I’ll do that at other blogs. Just wanted to put my quick two cents in: I can already tell from the trailer… I’m gonna like this movie.

Apparently, I’m an easy sell, though. I also like Star Trek: Insurrection and Star Trek: Nemesis.

There will be fan-boys freaking out about this one. I think that’s inevitable. (“They’re building the ship on the planet?! Oh No! This movie will suck!”) But there’s no pleasing those people. I really do enjoy Star Trek, but if an inconsistency or two show up… oh well. It’s a movie/franchise. Continuity wasn’t even invented until Star Trek went off the air originally. I think it’ll be great.

Despite having said that, there is one thing that I’m going to bring up as a potential continuity issue, but only because Abrams brought it up himself (or someone did in the interview I read somewhere): the Federation knows of, but has never met a Romulan face-to-face before the time period of the original series. I’m not sure how Abrams is going to deal with this then…

Romulan looking down at a "beaten" Kirk

Romulan looking down at Kirk during fight

Sure looks to me like Kirk and a Romulan in a fight.

Guess what. If they don’t explain it, I’ll be okay. A little disappointed, since they brought it up, but it won’t prevent me from liking the movie.

(Hmm… I haven’t even finished the 2008 movie list, yet, and it looks like I’ll need to start making my 2009 list.)

Related posts

Wil Wheaton reviews the show that made everyone hate him

Friday, November 17th, 2006

Star Trek: The Next Generation: The Last Outpost – TV Squad

[tag]Wil Wheaton[/tag] has taken to doing reviews of old [tag]Star Trek: The Next Generation[/tag] episodes. He’s only done a few so far, all from the first season, but they are very funny. A ton of pop-culture references make it even more fun to read.

While speaking as someone who played arguably the most hated hero character in sci-fi until [tag]Jar-Jar[/tag], he manages to skewer some of the stupid writing that plagued the show, particularly in its premier season.

Data says [tag]Ferengi[/tag] are like traders, and explains this with the most obvious contemporary reference: Yankee traders from 18th century America. This indicates that, in the 24th century, the traditional practice of using 400 year-old comparisons is still in vogue, like when you’re stuck in traffic on the freeway, and you say, “Man, this is just like Vasco de Gama trying to go around the Cape of Good Hope!”

The writing style is engaging, and I find myself agreeing completely with his take on the episodes. I hope he continues to post his thoughts.

Related posts

Star Trek, Babylon 5 style: Concept pitch revealed

Monday, June 19th, 2006

FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH | Bryce Zabel: Spaced Out: Hawking Colonies & Re-Booting Star Trek

Bryce Zabel (Dark Skies, Lois & Clark) and J. Michael Straczynski (Babylon 5, Crusade, Jeremiah) were sitting around in 2004 talking about the poor turnout in the Star Trek franchise and came up with an idea to reinvigorate it. And they wrote it down. And now, with J.J. Abrams named as the head of the next proposed Star Trek offering, their ideas will never be filmed—so they’ve released their treatment proposal to the public.

They wanted to “re-imagine” the Original Star Trek—the same Kirk, Spock, and McCoy, but with more up-to-date situations, motivations, and relationships, and a cohesive story arc. It’s the same kind of idea that has been accomplished so well with Battlestar Galactica.

I was one of the ones who hated the idea of re-imagining Battlestar Galactica, and I now think it’s one of the best shows on TV, so I’m not going to dismiss a “re-imagining” idea out of hand. That’s not to say that it would be easy to see this kind of thing happen, but I’d at least give it a chance (if it were to get one).

(I did find it funny that in their listing of Universe A, they left out Star Trek: Insurrection. Am I the only person who thought that was a worthwhile movie? Certainly not the best, but I’d put it above Generations, for sure.)

Interesting stuff, anyway. I’m glad they released it.

Related posts